Crash Test 2002-2006 Honda CR-V (Frontal Offset) IIHS

Frontal Impact

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Crash
• Test
• of
• 2002-2004
• Honda
• CR-V
• IIHS
• Frontal
• Impact

[MandHvideos]

I love how people give thumbs down to all the comments that are the truth

[blade7190]

well if it got best pick, your not gunna die, unless your a idiot and not gunna wear your seatbelt

[spk9grsch]

let me tell you guys something about honda, they suck, suspension sucks dick, brakes suck dick, frame sucks dick, interior sucks dick, good audio system, o yeah the engine and trans suck the most dick

[crashmaster455]

dude that was so blurry



[dreameratw1]

@Wako098 toyota has had the problem for the last two years not the past 10 ass

both honda and toyota are great but toyota has dominated honda severely in sales

[BillGtrMan]

If you look at where the driver wheel intrudes into the well, the main injuries are left leg injuries from a frontal crash according to the gov't Crash Test findings. It looks like the head also hits the pillar but I could be wrong. Note that any smaller car/SUV will have less metal to stop damage underneath or the injuries to a driver primarily.

[Tbg2011]

this CRV saved my life yesterday. we had a rollover at 70 mph and slide across all 3 lanes of I-70 on our roof until finally flipping right side up on the shoulder

[madhatter0110]

At 0:30, it looks as if the dummy's head hits the pillar between the drivers doors. For being a "best pick" there sure is a lot of dummy movement. Then again Honda vehicles are somewhat overrated and definitely overpriced.

[Wako098]

@ToyotaCorrola, and ALSO THUMBS UP FOR MY SISTER WHO HAS A 1999 HONDA CR-V, LIKE 105K MILES AND WITHOUT AN ACCIDENT AT ALL!!!!!!!!!