William Lane Craig vs Jamal Badawi Debate (HQ) 1/11

This is the full debate in high quality between Dr. William Lane Craig and Dr. Jamal Badawi at the University of Illinois from 1997.

Dr. William Lane Craig:

Ph.D. Philosophy, University of Birmingham, England
D. Theol. Theology, Universität München, Germany


Dr. Jamal Badawi:

Ph.D. Economics, Indiana University, United States


.....................................THE DEBATE.................................. .
THE CONCEPT OF GOD IN ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY

OPENING STATEMENTS: 20 minutes
Part 1-3: Dr. Craig's Opening Remarks
Part 4-6: Dr. Badawi's Opening Remarks

REBUTTALS: 12 minutes
Part 7: Dr. Craig Responds
Part 8: Dr. Craig concludes/Dr. Badawi begins Response
Part 9: Dr. Badawi Concludes Response

CLOSING REMARKS: 5 minutes
Part 10: Dr. Craig's Closing Comments
Part 11: Dr. Badawi's Closing Comments

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• debates
• William
• Lane
• Craig
• Jamal
• Badawi
• Concept
• of
• God
• Islam
• Christianity

[dr3am0nn]

If you are here for Alvarez' REL class.. thumbs uuup! lol >:)

[DeejayStamina246]

I am only here because of Alvarez's REL class lol

[StockportWesleyanC]

I am amazed at some of the comments against Craig! I guess there are none so blind as them that won't see!

[Klash92]

Craig puts me to sleep.

Both bible and koran are false. Stop believing in such ancient texts.

[xtremeownage2]

Continued... You are also incorrect in your statement about the Turkish library. The Quran dates back to the holy, pure, perfect, and infallible Prophet Muhammad (SAW/Peace be upon him) and their are older hand written Qurans that date to the early history of the Muslim nation. William's arguements are fallacious and the new testament has been proven as a lie and hoax by both Muslim and Western intellects. Christians who are honest also admit to the lies in the New Testament.

[xtremeownage2]

@Jen8973 ... Nope. Not only are you an avid liar, but you are delusional.

.

The only thing that William has is the benefit of having English as his first language. He clearly lost the debate, just like Newt Gingrich lost so many debates. But why do you nonsensical Christians still believe these people? Because they are articulate in the English language, but their arguements are fallacious and wrong.

.

The Quran was memorized by heart by millions of Hafiz men and women and is perfect.

[Jen8973]

@xtremeownage2 I'm sorry to say that what you said is not right. Dr Badawi shows a complete lack of understanding of both the Hebrew and New Testament teachings. Both of which have not been changed we have manuscripts from the 2th cen onwards and are exactly the same as we have today. The oldest Koran is dated the 10th cen in T Turkish main LIbrary. The Gospel where written in greek and the translations are true to its meanings its the Koran that is wrong.

[megapad100]

@damntull I feel these evidences are as vague as the evidence you gave last time. if you bothered to give me vague evidence last time, why not give me the concrete non-ambiogous evidence now?

[damntull]

@megapad100 It was quite plainly given by Jesus, in texts I have already given you. I'm not going to repeat myself over and over again.

[damntull]

@megapad100 You're just not listening. I provided the same evidence Craig did in the debate, but you simply ignore it.

[megapad100]

anyway once your provide the evidence we'll carry on. but preffereably give me a statement from a word of jesus, as we know the bible is majority not his words, please bring me something which jesus said from a red letter bible, where he clearly states hes god worship him, such a claim and core principle (whos god) should be given in plain terms as islam has, i do not want an ambigous statement.

[megapad100]

@damntull your points are all not backed up, i could rebuttal them but i want to see your evidence because i feel your evidence would be the same as last time, full of ambigous comments, that dont mean god.