Richard Dawkins' Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution?

http://www.discovery.org Darwin and Dawkins Dilemma: Climbing Mt. Improbable

A clip from the new film Darwin's Dilemma.

For more visit www.darwinsdilemma.org

Richard Dawkins has famously elaborated on Darwin's theory of natural selection, arguing that through a slow incremental process, evolution can explain the rise of new species. The new film, Darwin's Dilemma shows where Dawkins goes wrong. Growing evidence suggests that the creation of novel genetic information requires intelligence, and thus the burst of genetic information during the Cambrian Explosion provides convincing evidence that animal life is the product of intelligent design rather than a blind undirected process like natural selection.

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/discoverycsc
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/DiscoveryCSC
Website: http://www.discovery.org

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Richard
• Dawkins
• Charles
• Darwin
• Greatest
• Show
• Earth
• Climbing
• Mt.
• Improbable
• Origin
• Species
• Stephen
• Meyer
• Evolution
• Intelligent
• Design
• Biology
• Science
• Creaitonism
• Darwinism
• Discovery Institute

[XUltra00]

Intelligent Design people are sad losers, they won't even allow ratings on their videos, because they know they are going to get thumbs down, LOL

[eyallev]

@superFGS11 no, they are saying that the cambrian did not happen. that if it was, as the evolutionists are saying, than it was too short to produce what evolution is saying it did.

[HonGyakku]

My problem with Dawkins is he preaches evolution as fact. Its a THEORY. He is no better than creationists with their religion. Atleast they dont claim to have proof! Trll dawkins to show his proof it is not a THEORY. Its theory! He does science no favors being a zealot like religion!

[HonGyakku]

@mcmcmcmeaty while youre at it google "piltdown man" and read all about how evolutionists could not find hard evidence so they purposely fabricated some and science accepted it for 40 years before it was proven intentionally fraudulent, now no evolutionists want it brought up. FACT

[harleyxxfabco]

@Wishingstarification And any scientist who came upon that house would acknowledge that it had an intelligent designer.

[mcmcmcmeaty]

@harleyxxfabco Actually, it is explained as has been for a long time. It's been shown that Doug Axe was in fact, intellectually disingenuous with his experiments. Just search "panda thumb axe" and you'll find a nice scholarly article that debunks Axe's junk science.

[harleyxxfabco]

@eyallev The engine for change is not explained. Random mutations cannot explain the vast diversity of life that sprang up in a relatively short period of time.

[harleyxxfabco]

@thejewishagnostic When you have to result to name calling you have lost the debate.

Cheers.

[harleyxxfabco]

@thejewishagnostic Chimps and humans had the same Designer. Why wouldn't He use similar DNA?