27-Biblical Creationism & Darwinism

The 27th episode of RUSS ONLINE!

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• creation
• evolution
• science
• ministries
• evolve
• darwin
• video
• series
• russ
• miller
• online
• God
• Jesus
• worldview
• worldviews
• America

[Pharmaecopia1]

Extremely interesting that within a 9 minute video it is possible to include:

- at least 2 or 3 strawmen

- three perfect examples of quote mining

- at least a few extremely disgusting lies

- some examples of poor logic

I as a former christian thought that lying is a sin. Funny how it doesn't apply to creationists. Or would you like to enlighten that why ideas and people are intentionally misrepresented on this video?

[CreationMinistries]

I notice that you did not point anything out to back up your claims - typical

[Pharmaecopia1]

a) Creationists never specify what this kind is

b) Polystrate fossils are not proof of a "massive aqueous event" it is a creationist term and shown not to hold.

c) The variance of carbon in geological stratum

d) Bad logic with the carbon dating (200,000-6,000 why the jump)

e) The amount of carbon in geological stratum

f) Darwinism is not a term

g) Darwin didn't predict anything about genes as he didn't know about them

h) He is misrepresenting TOE by using a strawman

[CreationMinistries]

a) Definition of Kind: A group of organisms which have brought forth (descended) from the genetic information found in their original ancestor.

NOTE: Variations within such a group occur due to the sorting (recombination) or loss (Gene Depletion/Genetic Entropy) of the originally created genetic data. The rest of your claims are as easily refuted but I am too busy to play right now

[Pharmaecopia1]

i) Lacks understanding about evolution "kinds evolving to another kind" as this is again a strawman.

j) Lying about information in the gene

k) Lying about the methods in mutations

l) Horrible quote mine from Herbert Nilsson

m) misrepresenting the "trees of life"

n) Lying about both the amounts of fossils and the amounts of fossils that should be found

o) Quotemining Darwin in 5:34

p) Interpretation of naturalism and their agenda + this alleged conspiracy BS again

[CreationMinistries]

Lack understanding (Stupid), liar, etc.,....name calling is the last bastion for those with no evidence to back up their position

[TheScienceFoundation]

No, abiogenesis is the study of the progression of life from non life, and everything from the past 60 years of research has only supported it. It's a perfect example of science because we don't know and simply say we don't know, we don't attempt to cram any superfluous undetectable origin in the gap.

I don't need to explain how life began to define species, see watch: Any family of organisms which can breed and produce fertile offspring.

So quit dodging the question and define 'kind'

[TheScienceFoundation]

There is no 'getting around the law of biogenesis' required, Redi and Pasteurs work concluded modern life does not spontaneously generate form non living matter and had nothing to do with abiogenesis.

I don't see why the question is so hard; What is your definition of kind?

[TheScienceFoundation]

No, he was just pointing out that you're arguing against a strawman because you have no idea what evolution actually is.

[cathy356]

unscientific darwinism cannot refute scientific fact.

[2xtream]

Russ your teaching has helped so many in sharing the word of God and how simple things are without mans intervention. Thanks for pointing out how man has corrupted science, with dreams of removing God from his world.

[ProudToBLoud]

No naturalistic  science(so called science) as evolution has had such a blatant history of fraud and dishonesty.