@Jimbofx911 Only a nuke makes sense as to the total vaporisation of tires and the wire ply in them that is absent in the images and the vaporization of organic matirials in the cars busses ect. Also the molten bedrock would be hard to produce without the heat of a thermo nuclear device. Again the beryllium may have been from steel vaporized. Beryllium from a nuke forms a carbon type. Just to be clear.
Just so you know, it is hard to think that nuke may indeed have been used. If they were and yes there is a good chance they were , it would have been in the sub-basements to break the connection between the bedrock and the cores. In fact years earlier, upon reflection the 500 pounds of liquid high explosives fell far short of the energy needed to do the job. Seems they learned from the first failed FBI attempt. I am an orgainc chemist, with limited interest or knowledge in nukes.
@MrSammo1 Sorry you feel that way. I know 911 was planned and the towers were demolished. I just rather think facts not speculation must be used to resolve the who what where when and why of the event. Fact is used in courts, thats what will collar these criminals.
@MrSammo1 When beryllium is used in nukes it reduces to a form of carbon. Beryllium may have come from computes and the actual steel of the building as it and molidium or molly oxide were part of the steel formula used on twin towers.
@Jimbofx911 Much of the rubble pile shows cutter charge usage and the massif corrosion of the box outer frame even as it was in free fall show rapid oxidizing agents were planted inside the outer frames. Odd are good the rest of the job was planned with conventional tools.
@MrSammo1 The explosives that left the egg shape craters were indeed very powerful. Yes bedrock melted and did pool. I really cannot say what other then a nuke of some kind could melt bedrock. I do think that so many different types of tools for that trade have been created and tested, many keep from the eye of the general public. I tend to think non-nuke but have no idea what else may have been used.
That thing disappears.
dukeraul624 1 month ago
@Jimbofx911 Only a nuke makes sense as to the total vaporisation of tires and the wire ply in them that is absent in the images and the vaporization of organic matirials in the cars busses ect. Also the molten bedrock would be hard to produce without the heat of a thermo nuclear device. Again the beryllium may have been from steel vaporized. Beryllium from a nuke forms a carbon type. Just to be clear.
Jimbofx911 1 month ago
Just so you know, it is hard to think that nuke may indeed have been used. If they were and yes there is a good chance they were , it would have been in the sub-basements to break the connection between the bedrock and the cores. In fact years earlier, upon reflection the 500 pounds of liquid high explosives fell far short of the energy needed to do the job. Seems they learned from the first failed FBI attempt. I am an orgainc chemist, with limited interest or knowledge in nukes.
Jimbofx911 1 month ago
@MrSammo1 Sorry you feel that way. I know 911 was planned and the towers were demolished. I just rather think facts not speculation must be used to resolve the who what where when and why of the event. Fact is used in courts, thats what will collar these criminals.
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
@Jimbofx911 Is that the best you guys at Langley can do? Carbon? Computers?
Shill peacefully.
MrSammo1 2 months ago
@MrSammo1 When beryllium is used in nukes it reduces to a form of carbon. Beryllium may have come from computes and the actual steel of the building as it and molidium or molly oxide were part of the steel formula used on twin towers.
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
@Jimbofx911 There's also the beryllium poisoning that the workers died from.
MrSammo1 2 months ago
@Jimbofx911 Much of the rubble pile shows cutter charge usage and the massif corrosion of the box outer frame even as it was in free fall show rapid oxidizing agents were planted inside the outer frames. Odd are good the rest of the job was planned with conventional tools.
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
@MrSammo1 The explosives that left the egg shape craters were indeed very powerful. Yes bedrock melted and did pool. I really cannot say what other then a nuke of some kind could melt bedrock. I do think that so many different types of tools for that trade have been created and tested, many keep from the eye of the general public. I tend to think non-nuke but have no idea what else may have been used.
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
@Jimbofx911 What else explains the resolidified rock?
MrSammo1 2 months ago