Intelligent Design movement founder admits its not science.

With Ken Miller

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• ID
• is
• not
• science
• intelligent
• design
• creationism
• dover
• evolution

[msugarpants]

Robbypjr is apparently a freakin nutcase



[robbypjr]

@GermanChocolateCake { " PROSPERITY MESSAGE A LIE , DECEPTION " }.... THE ONES GETTING RICH ARE FALSE PROPHETS OF GOD , DECEPTION EVERYWHERE IN PROSTATE CHURCH OF TODAY , BUT YOU AND I CAN NOT GO WRONG READING AND PRACTICING WHAT THE BIBLE TRULY SAYS...." AMEN "

[GermanChocolateCake]

@robbypjr And the start of church profits. Funny that...prophet's profits.

[robbypjr]

@GermanChocolateCake { " FEAR OF " GOD " IS THE BEGINNING OF WISDOM " }

[robbypjr]

@robbypjr { " JESUS CHRIST " IS COMING BACK SOON , AND I WILL NOT SUGAR COAT IT EVERYTHING GOING ON IN USA NATURAL DISASTERS AND OTHER BAD THINGS ARE A SIGN TO US CHRISTIANS JESUS IS COMING BACK SOON , LIKE VERY SOON , AND I PROMISE IF YOU AND OTHERS WILL NOR REPENT " GOD WILL " DESTROY " ALL OF YOU JUST AS IN THE DAYS OF NOAH...TAKE HEED MY DEAR FRIENDS OF THE HUMAN RACE , " EVERY KNEE WILL BOW AND EVERY TONGUE WILL CONFESS " JESUS CHRIST " IS LORD" { " REPENT AND EXCEPT THE LORD JESUS " } !!!

[MissingChurchill]

@German,

You seem to think our conversation began when I said, "Hey GCC, will you teach me?"

YOU began the conversation, my friend, because you disagreed with what I was implying. You assert that the evidence DOES exist...you just don't seem to know where.

I'm not raising the question because I haven't studied but because I've looked much deeper than my undegraduate. And my studies exposed this massive deficiency in the evidence.

For the fifth or sixth time, feel free to correct me.

[GermanChocolateCake]

@MissingChurchill The only thing we've reached the end of is my willingness to be a professor for you on youtube. I'm not going to teach you. I'm expecting you to have the integrity and intellectual honesty to study yourself. I simply don't have room to write a dissertation here, nor the time or patience. If you can't be bothered to get an actual education in the subject you are trying to discredit (using biased unscientific sources), then you really don't have an academic leg to stand on.

[MissingChurchill]

@GermanChocolateCake

Clearly we've reached the end of your competence in the matter. I've asked you to point me to one article, one paper, one study that demonstrates the sufficiently creative power of EOV and NS. The two specific links you've suggested fail to provide anything of the sort.

Presumably you're familiar with the evidence for which I'm asking given that you're so confident in the theory...and certainly you wouldn't be so confident in the absence of evidence, would you?

[GermanChocolateCake]

@MissingChurchill "contradicting me would be as easy as pointing me to the evidence". I already have, there is a wealth of information on the web, and far superior information to be found in formal education. I recommend you seek both. Especially the formal education, as the web is a breeding ground for false premises and biased information all too often.

However, I'd say that there is far more evidence in current scientific endeavor regarding the complexity of

life than for its origins.

[MissingChurchill]

@German

Surely you see that my point is not about "biological origins" (which science has no explanation of at all). I'm questioning "biological complexity" which science CLAIMS to exlain but which I assert it absolutely does not.

Again, my thesis is simply that one of the most confident assumptions in the field of biology today is hockus pockus, and contradicting me would be as easy as pointing me to the evidence.