Undeniable Proof a Plane did NOT Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 ~ 1/8
Top Comments
All Comments (546)
-
Eyewitnesses= homeless guys living in the gas station that we payed $ to have them say what we want them to say. The video of the plane hitting the building isn't conclusive enough.
-
What we have here is an expert in speculation, and also an expert on what is supposed to happen when a plane crashes(he thinks). I speculate that Mickey Mouse was flying the plane. And what about the people that were on that flight that died and their families buried them? A simple case of witness protection for 100+ people all at once? Better call the actors from In Plain Sight they might have some information on these cases. You are a horrible speculator sir.
-
Show me a window, hell, show me anything that's 757 proof. It's completely unreasonable that you're making that argument.
-
@SolerMotorsports How do you know how the Pentagon works when impacted by a plane? Show me your proof because I've never seen a plane hit anything without having large chunks of debris somewhere. The Space Shuttle Colombia had larger debris than they found at the pentagon for fucks sake.
-
"NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT - 9/11 PENTAGON ATTACK" - copy and paste this to watch the full documentary
-
@solarmotorsports he is say that the physical impact of something that size should have demolished those windows.
-
@davis4037 not possible. Think about how big a 747 is, if it slid into a column collision damage would happen period. Regardless of how strong a building is impact damage from a plane that size would still be evident.
-
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
How many of Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth's 1600+ architectural and engineering professionals have experience in structural engineering, high rise construction, or controlled demolition?
What did Hani Hanjour’s flight instructors have to say about his flying ability?
Who was Ali Mohamed and what is his relationship with Osama Bin Laden and the CIA?
-
@SolerMotorsports Thousands of Engineers have spoken out against 9/11.. look up engineers for 9/11 truth.. but the whole window comment was stupid, I agree.. smh.
STOOOOOOP!!!
"Although these windows were blast proof, it is not reasonable to suggest they weren't 757-proof"
Why not? How are you basing this claim? Got any calcs to prove it? Manufacturer's cut sheets? UL test results? Are you a window manufacturer? Myth Busters, at least? I'm tired of hearing unfounded claims on how the damage "should've occurred" based on nothing but speculation from people without the slightest clue of physics, chemistry, structural engineering, etc.
SolerMotorsports 1 month ago 7
@kolbrunhelga1 Well, the Pentagon IS built stronger than anything else but it does not make planes disappear. It just shatters them to pieces. Debris from the plane was all over the place. And you might be right about us having to learn to build skyscrapers: the chief civil engineer that designed the WTC towers said that they thought of all kinds of storms and natural disasters but the thought of a plane hitting the towers and the resulting jet fuel fire never even crossed their minds.
SolerMotorsports 1 month ago 2