Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

AAI Copenhagen 2010: P.Z. Myers - Speaking truth to absurdity [1/4]

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
22,780
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 10, 2010

Speaking truth to absurdity: Why science education needs vocal atheists.

P.Z. Myers has been told many times that atheists are scary, and that they frighten moderate god-believers away from science ... and that it would be better to mute the expression of their views on religion in order to promote science, rather than godlessness. However, that atheism is a product of an honest appreciation of the evidence, of the logic of science, and of the folly of magical and superstitious thinking.

The reason that atheists need to speak out even more loudly is that it is the only view that is true to the science, and that serves an even greater mission than science education: the encouragement of critical thinking in all matters in the populace. Besides, religion is just plain goofy.

--
About P.Z. Myers:

Prof. Paul Zachary Myers works with zebrafish in the field of evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo). A selfavowed godless liberal and outspoken atheist, he is a vocal skeptic of all forms of religion, superstition, spirituality and pseudoscience.

He is quoted as having "nothing but contempt for Intelligent Design", arguing that it is "fundamentally dishonest". In 2009 Myers was named the American Humanist Association's Humanist of the Year.
--
P.Z.Myers on the web:
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (AteistiskSelskab)

  • @JMcH Oh, so they do not disagree on "core issues of Christianity"... So why do they make new churches, rituals, ceremonies, liturgy, bible interpretations and congregations? If it's not that big a deal, then why even bother? Please explain!

  • @AteistiskSelskab - The things you mention are not core issues.

  • @JMcH And I didn't say they are core issues! I asked you WHY these funny little people think it's necessary to create new churches etc. when YOU say they do not disagree on "core issues of Christianity"... Then why create a new church professor?

see all

All Comments (110)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @JMcH Guess what science never ever does? Choose to embrace or dogmatically cling to ideas.

    That's your job, asshole.

  • @JMcH No, no it isn't. Making shit up doesn't help you. Crying about it sure don't help, either.

  • @TaylorThaHick - Ah, a clever little video. I love how they start out defining what open-mindedness is in a way that favors their position, but which is without any sort of neutral source. "This is what open-mindedness is because we say that's what it is." And it just degenerates from there on in.

  • @TaylorThaHick - Morton's neuromas do not fix themselves. The only man-made permanent "solution" to them is surgery to sever/remove or otherwise disable (through alcohol injections or a cryogenic treatment) the affected part of the nerve. We researched this. As I said, though, such "solutions" have serious negative side effects. My wife's pain was a daily struggle for her. We're now several years past her healing and she has never complained once about neuroma pain in her feet.

  • @MultiUniv3rsal - Actually, the word "neo-atheist" has been around for a while and is often used in the atheist community. Does lying about me and telling me to kill myself make you feel smart?

  • @Woland440 - A lot of science gave up its future when it chose to embrace and dogmatically cling to the ideas of abiogenesis, evolution, and a universe created from nothing.

  • @TaylorThaHick - True insanity is rare. You're labeling billions of people in the world as insane. Is that really the position you wish to take? Is the human race truly that bad off according to you?

  • @TaylorThaHick - "Occasionally?" Quite the straw man you have burning there. The Bible has been accurate on far, far more than just "some... towns and a few people." It literally has been responsible for more archaeological finds than any other source from antiquity. Even when the historical record of the Bible was doubted and even vehemently refuted, later findings vindicated the biblical record and new findings continue to do so.

  • @JMcH @JMcH I'd like you to watch a video on open mindedness. You may use the terms open and closed minded in a different way after watching the video.  youtube.com/watch?v=T69TOuqaqX­I

  • @JMcH I am curious what the doctor would have made of your cause analysis - would they say "that was impossible, its a miracle" or "neuromas often fix themselves" or something to that effect.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more