The next part of the proof will be to show that the something that brought forth space-time energy and matter has the properties of the Aristotelian/Thomistic God not the laws of physics.
You reason with philosophical materialism. I reason with Thomistic realism abiding in Christ. This is the philosophy that brought about the hard core sciences in the first place. Apart from such philosophy , science will wither and die.
Define what the properties of the laws of physics are apart from mentioning space-time energy and matter. You can't because the laws of physics are a part of the nature of space-time energy and matter not independent of them. The laws are ingrained into the very deepest fabric of space-time energy and matter. You can't have the laws of physics without the existence of space-time energy and matter. The laws of physics are not some spiritual being independent of matter.
We know that the laws of physics are integrated with space-time energy and matter. We would say that the laws of physics are a part of the nature of space--time etc. The laws of physics came into being with space-time matter and energy. Believing that the laws of physics existed apart from such quantities and brought into being such quantities is speculation.If you believe this then you must show that the something that begat space-time etc had the properties of the laws of physics
One of my underlying principles is nothing begets nothing. I have shown that time had to have a beginning. Infinite past time is a fallacy. Something had to initiate space time. It cannot be nothing. Nothing begets nothing. So the next question should be what are the properties of that something. Does it have the properties of the Aristotelian/Thomistic God or the raw laws of physics disconnected from space-time energy and matter , existing apart from these things?
@antjam666
The next part of the proof will be to show that the something that brought forth space-time energy and matter has the properties of the Aristotelian/Thomistic God not the laws of physics.
You reason with philosophical materialism. I reason with Thomistic realism abiding in Christ. This is the philosophy that brought about the hard core sciences in the first place. Apart from such philosophy , science will wither and die.
jvolpe1 9 months ago
@antjam666
Define what the properties of the laws of physics are apart from mentioning space-time energy and matter. You can't because the laws of physics are a part of the nature of space-time energy and matter not independent of them. The laws are ingrained into the very deepest fabric of space-time energy and matter. You can't have the laws of physics without the existence of space-time energy and matter. The laws of physics are not some spiritual being independent of matter.
jvolpe1 9 months ago
@antjam666
We know that the laws of physics are integrated with space-time energy and matter. We would say that the laws of physics are a part of the nature of space--time etc. The laws of physics came into being with space-time matter and energy. Believing that the laws of physics existed apart from such quantities and brought into being such quantities is speculation.If you believe this then you must show that the something that begat space-time etc had the properties of the laws of physics
jvolpe1 9 months ago
@antjam666
One of my underlying principles is nothing begets nothing. I have shown that time had to have a beginning. Infinite past time is a fallacy. Something had to initiate space time. It cannot be nothing. Nothing begets nothing. So the next question should be what are the properties of that something. Does it have the properties of the Aristotelian/Thomistic God or the raw laws of physics disconnected from space-time energy and matter , existing apart from these things?
jvolpe1 9 months ago