The Impossible Flood: Part 1

I'm new to making videos, so if anyone has suggestions, I'd be happy to see them.

Part 1 of my series- enjoy.

This video is my first one of two in the series debunking the hydroplate 'theory'. It shows that even if all the conditions described by Creationists were met, the hydroplate theory would only cause an event inconsistent with the Biblical Flood and would also probably boil everything on earth alive.

Music Used: We Are by Ana Johnnson and Nemo by Nightwish

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Noah's
• Ark
• Flood
• Science
• Religion
• Christianity
• Evolution
• Creationism
• Judaism
• Bible
• Evidence

[eagleeye2102]

At greater depth, pressure increases. If pressure increases, the boiling point rises. Therefore, subterranean water would not have boiled by leaving it's chamber.

[IceFire9yt]

@eagleeye2102 Ah, but after it left its chamber, the pressure would be released and the water could boil.

[InternetDarkLord]

@rhuezo67 The mountains pushed up over long periods, it need only rise a little faster than erosion. And why are mountain chains like the Andes and Appalachians eroded so differently if they are not different ages?

[rhuezo67]

@InternetDarkLord You do not apply any common sense to your reasoning, we are often told that "those mountains have been there 60 millions years", if you allow for 60 million years of erosion, you will no longer have a mountain but a hill.

[InternetDarkLord]

@rhuezo67 Nonsense, uplift need only slightly exceed erosion more often than not to build mountains.

Evolution is increasing entropy, by vast amounts. Life on earth is driven by the sun, and the waste heat generated by this process vastly exceeds the order lost by atomic structure in the sun. In effect, organized solar structure becomes waste heat, with evolution as a step along the way. Entropy always increases.

[rhuezo67]

@InternetDarkLord Mr. DarkLord, please do not strike me down for sayng so, but your short sided observation does not allow for EROSION! or the 2nd law of thermodynamics better known as entropy.

[InternetDarkLord]

@AndyG792 That is not an assumption, since your argument assumes a global flood happened. There is no evidence of any. There is plenty of hard evidence none ever did: chronostratigraphy, coral reef annual layering, bryozoan stratification, dendrochronology, electron-spin resonance, fossil indexes, geomagnetic dating, lichenometry, Milankovitch cycles, ice sheet cores, ocean bottom sediments, rock varnish, Mitochondrial or Y chromosome DNA analysis, thermoluminescence..etc...

[AndyG792]

@InternetDarkLord Your making the assumption that the earth before the flood was like it is today and that such an enormous amount of water would not change the earth in any way.

[AndyG792]

excuse me ... correction! The word Gut should be But. Sorry!

[AndyG792]

If your wanting to make a name for yourself, why don't you take Dr. Brown's offer of a debate on his web site? Gut, you would have to read his book first as that is one of the requirements of the debate. The offer has been available for 20+ years and no one has taken him up on it yet. Why don't you be the first if you know so much.