Large scale structure formation in the Universe simulated

This is a simulation of structure formation in the Universe using the adhesion approximation. The algorithm is described by Weinberg and Gunn in MNRAS in 1990

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• adhesion2

[WhatIsGod]

looks like the magnetic field produced by the free flowing electrons between the galaxies configured them into the same structure that plasma takes. the pull of electromagnetic fields is much stronger then the pull of the " graviton" and the universe is 99% free flowing electrons. no no no scientific dogma clearly states that gravity is the driving force in the universe. there must be a extremely complicated and inherently faulty explanation involving gravity electromagnetic fields do nothing.

[JohannesHidding]

@WhatIsGod why the angry tone? A lot of telescope time has been spend looking for hot plasma's and they have been found at the center of clusters. There is no observational basis for the existence of large scele EM forces, except for tenuous magnetic fields in galagies. These fields are _measurable_. Add to that that there is no cosmological explanation to create large scale EM fields (not even the ones that we do measure), while the cosmological evidence for dark matter is solid.

[WhatIsGod]

Galactic magnetic fields at scholarpedia

galaxies act as central hubs for the free flowing electrons. any can i ask what evidence you have for dark matter? " gravitational lensing?, stars orbiting at a distance and speed that exceeds the pull of gravity? even a slight magnetic pull at a great distance will still be stronger then the gravitational attraction produced by the same object. sorry im not hostel, i just get trapped in random science kicks like this

[JohannesHidding]

@WhatIsGod This has been looked at in a Nature article in 1992 (Battaner et al.) and follow ups. The conclusion from

(Sánchez-Salcedo & Reyes-Ruiz 2004) is that magnetic fields are not sufficient to explain rotation curves of galaxies. Also note that main stream science is not shy with respect to losing dark matter. The current theory simply has the most complete explanation of what we observe.

[funradiant]

Perhaps the essence of a quantum theory capable of holding its weight in water, (so to speak), lies in a theorist's abilities in rightly dividing the truth. We thank the past and present science enthusiasts for their magnificent insight, for it is considered that there is truth to be discovered hidden in the darkness and should such a jewel be found, some kind of secret I will share with you!!

[AndreaismyTrueLove]

Thanks for uploading! It's amazing to see, like watching a plant grow or something... Anyway, cheeers!

[WhatIsGod]

Respond to this video... i rarely have a chance to converse with others on a level, where i can be provided with sufficient answers to my questions. it is nice. thank you for your time and access to your knowledge. the angry tone was simply an accidental outcome to personal frustration in not being able to acquire proper and full explanations to my questions.

[WhatIsGod]

@JohannesHidding thank you for the answer albeit at the edge of my understanding. it is not beyond my comprehension. this is exactly the type of answer i was looking for. thank you. may light itself have the answer for the " problems of dark matter? and is there any basis for considering that light itself may have some form of " gravitational " pull on matter? if not a pull in the gravitational sense maybe it applies a force to an m-brain based universe through dragging on the "surface" space?

[porkchopsisgood]

@arlpainbringer It's a graphical representation of every object in the universe. Hard to approximate on Youtube without being a tad "blurry," wouldn't you say?

[mdoerkse]

What is adhesion approximation in laymans terms? What is going on besides simple gravitational attraction?