Sacred 2 Physx on/off

Physx in Sacred 2 with a special patch that is supposed to launch in the beginning of April.

Category:

Gaming

Tags:

• Sacred
• Physx
• comparison
• Vergleich

[Mokkatomic]

Well physics in games are cool, and stuff, and the performance hit is to live with. Nvidia is all bussiness, and demand that you buy their cards to be able to play with Physx, and thats fine too - except for the fact that Physx uses some old shit x87 code and no SSE, which basicly means that you are crippled if you use your cpu instead of your graphicscard.

Nice way to cripple everyone without your product in games that use Physx for physics, dickbags.

Oh, and water behaves like liquid mercury

[Drragnorr]

@SeanUCF Nope I have one gtx460 and game runs like a charm with physx on.

[Dysphoricsmile]

@fanmanabc I have speedstep disabled. Therefore it runs a CONSTANT clock, with single core turbo, wtf mobo are you running???

[TheMarcusman14]

left is shitty xbox 360's and ps3's right is a beast the computer almighty hands down God

[fanmanabc]

@Dysphoricsmile

ugh, i can tell you from experience. thats not how overclocking a 2500k chip is done. if you have speedstep enabled, the clock will simply jump from a stock 3.3 to your overclocked frequency. a 4 to 4.7 is not how its done. Also, the 460 is a good card, but you can't compare it to higher end cards. It just simply won't have the same amount of cores no matter how high you clock it. just my two cents.

[IRumburakI]

@BKsMassive 46 people have old PC ? :-D

[Dysphoricsmile]

I defy you to see a difference between 1600x1200 with 32xCSAA with 8x supersample transpearncy, 16x aniso, triple buffering with both aniso and triple sample optimisation and any higher resolution! especially considering that 1600x1200 is on a 19" monitor I may have only a 460, but its clocked to 833 core 1666 shader and 1100 memory which translates to 144gb/sec to videoram. All rock stable done using MSI afterburner. I too have an i5 2500k clocked to 4ghz turbos at 4.7

[Dysphoricsmile]

@BKsMassive Only a "faggot" would call someone a faggot for using 1600x1200 when not only is that the MAX many games allow, but it is my monitor's limit! bunch of uneducated apes talking like they know things, I hate ignorance, especially when someone who does know something calls ppl "faggots" for playing on 1600x1200 (which btw is FAR higher than ANY HDTV!) and if you knew a fucking thing about new hardware you WASTED MONEY on a 560 hawx! a 560ti is the same price and MUCH faster!

[BKsMassive]

@Dysphoricsmile

1, i do not play consoles. i sold my Xbox 360 after realising how bad the graphics were compared to my rig.

2, the guy i was replying to said his CPU would do everything PhysX does. which is impossible. which is why i said he won't get over 10 FPS.

3, i have a i5 2500K & a GTX560 Hawk. Love my rig (:

4, only faggots use 1600x1200 resolution. i use 2560x1600 but before i got my big ass monitor i used 1920x1200

5, Yes i know all about AA & AF and all that good shiet.

[Dysphoricsmile]

@Mokkatomic OH and those new Intel sandybridges I was talking about? they have a built in GPU with 112 SPE's and oh, yes, what they call nvidia invention which obviously has nothing to offter rendered graphics? PHYSX!! PHYSX does nothing but add to graphics in gameplay. you ppl are obnoxiously retarded those who wrote the posts that provoked my ire and all of you why gavew it a thumbs up, AND all you who have written similar posts.

[Dysphoricsmile]

@Mokkatomic Guess what? ALL THE GRAPHIC PRECISION YOUR CPU HAS (unless its a BRAND NEW sandy bridge intel i5 or i7) IS 32BIT! DONT GIVE A FUCK IF U R RUNNING a 64bit OS UR CPU HAS DICK FOR GPU ACCELERATION IN ALL CASES! I mean goddamn I love this invention - the interrnet, it lets fucking retards talk like they know something... AND PPL BELIEVE THEM! I hate ignorance and people being jealous of better setups and rendering.