WTC 2 True Timebase ? (Call for Higher Quality version)

Many clips of the descent of WTC 2 run at varying frame-rates, with varying timebase, resulting in incorrect descent time calculations.

I believe this may be 'true' rate.

I could REALLY do with a better quality version for a sub-project.

If you have a better quality version, PLEASE get in touch.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• WTC
• DEMOLITION
• WTC2
• 911

[911PL]

Of what documentary or the program does this excerpt date?

[ujisx]

Simon Shack has 3 variations of a common shot by 3 different authors around that location similar to what PollenB typed.

Wolfgang Staehle

Robert Clark

Tina Cart

watch?v=V_iKnwZ2Fq4 (6:30-6:50)

PollenB: Who is CIA and who said or you just speculating?

[ujisx]

That was all they were doing to you on TV was psyoping with something akin to a racial slur of sorts.

The historical meaning of the word movement for communications is being properly used with other terms that is not the case.

The same sort of tactics is used against any movement.

[femr2]

"The only way you can stop them from trying to psyop you to death is to die"

Not a smart thing to say in my opinion. 'They' can psyop my ass day-in day-out and it'll have absolutely no effect on me. I know the truth, and can recognise the primitive 'psyop' methods from a great distance. If such things personally affect you, then I suggest stepping back a little and rationalising 'why'. I'm not sure why you feel it necessary to continue this conversation, but I suggest you take a break.

[ujisx]

The only way you can stop them from trying to psyop you to death is to die. I never watch any TV because it stresses my out within 5 minutes. How can you stand that stuff? I can easily imagine it is terrible.

[femr2]

All very true of course, but I choose to throw off such stereotyping and act as a concerned individual. 'We' do not not need to reinforce 'their' methods by repeating the fallacy. In my opinion several million individual voices is much more powerful than a single 'voice' from a non existent 'Truth Movement'. I'm not arguing with you though, simply stating my opinion. When a 'nutjob' claiming to be part of the 'Truth Movement' is shown on TV making ludicrous claims, does he speak for you ?

[ujisx]

The state and its supporters have always tried to clump its detractors with any perceived nut case available at the time to discredit them or distort and pervert words into doublespeak and newspeak to eliminate communication and maintain power. Changing terminology will not stop them from trying to psyop you to death. Just understand what they are doing so you can deal with it.

[femr2]

The danger with your viewpoint is that the 'debunkers' and the 'media' have latched on to the term 'Truth Movement' and bundled scientists presenting accurate studies in with those who suggest that little green men vaporised the towers from planet zod. Reinforcing that each piece of evidence should be approached on it's individual merit is very important in breaking the pre-conceived misconceptions that those responsible have 'forced' upon the 'public' perception.

Please understand this.

[onesliceshort]

Quote for the day and the reason I´m going for a siesta right now.....

¨Mohammed Atta had a degree in structural engineering and so knew where to hit the towers to make them collapse. It makes perfect sense. ¨ Oo

[ujisx]

It is for sure a movement. Political actions groups have always been categorized as movements. You do not have to belong to any group to be part of a movement. Anybody who disagrees with the official story is part of the 911 Truth Movement one way or another. Nobody is ever going to know 100% of the truth of 911, because that is impossible. I am just me too. Everybody is just me. Some people belong to groups others do not, but that does not mean they are not a part of a general movement.