Big Problems with the Big Bang Theory- Jason Lisle

Modern teens don't know what to believe about the Bible and Christianity. Fortunately, they earnestly want to know the truth!

The purpose of the Answers Academy apologetics curriculum is to equip viewers of all ages to answer the questions the world is asking about the authority and accuracy of the Bible. During the thirteen illustrated lessons included with the full curriculum kit, your class or small group will discover why it is vital to provide logical answers to skeptics, and how to give those answers with a solid understanding of what the Bible says about geology and astronomy. Viewers will learn that, contrary to popular belief, operational science runs counter to the idea of evolution and "millions of years." The facts of nature, rightly interpreted, provide an irrefutable case for the accuracy and trustworthiness of the book that claims to be the inspired Word of the Creator Himself!

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Answers
• Academy:
• Big
• Problems
• with
• the
• Bang
• Jason
• Lisle
• Genesis
• Ken
• Ham
• Science
• False
• God
• Creation
• Evolution
• Proof
• Logic
• Theory
• philosophy
• inspirational
• space
• musical instruments
• health diet
• defence
• director
• science
• atheism
• atheist
• bible
• debate

[odinata]

@357MagnumBob

Googling hasn't replaced understanding, has it bob?

Your religious opinions haven't replaced science, bob.

You have a political opinion, not a science education.

[85Damix]

Where did he studied?

[mandrillx]

ok there is so many flaws in this guys logic and reasoning. but I will just go with the first flaw he starts with. He states no one was there is ot see it, the same goes with his magic invisible geani god making a universe no one there to see,.and using the bible like it supose sort ext book is a joke. The bible is right because the bible says its right, no evidence no proof, epic fail lol

[maffhunt]

@357MagnumBob In saying that they are the usual theories, he was not referring to the textbooks but science as a whole. So he is attacking a strawman in effect, as for the horizon and flatness problems, I suggest you look at inflation to get the solutions to those problems.

I understand that you want you deity at the centre of everything but unfortunately that's just not the case. The transition idea has it's base in solid theoretical physics.

[357MagnumBob]

@357MagnumBob

Try Googling "Problems with the Big Bang" and see how great the later versions of the theory are. Still many major problems, still unviable. Creation theory only lacks an answer for light travel time, which is a problem to the philosophical naturalist, but not if God made the stars to be observed... seeing the deep field SHOULD help us prideful, brain dead humans understand that the term "God Almighty," an ubersuperlative (yes I made that up), is no exaggeration.

[357MagnumBob]

Try Googling "Problems with the Big Bang" and see how great the later versions of the theory are. Still many major problems, still unviable. Creation theory only lacks an answer for light travel time, which is a problem to the philosophical naturalist, but not if God made the stars to be observed... seeing the deep field SHOULD help us prideful, brain dead humans understand that the term "God Almighty," an ubersuperlative (yes I made that up), is no exaggeration.

[357MagnumBob]

@maffhunt

Try Googling "Problems with the Big Bang" and see how great the later versions of the theory are. Still many major problems, still unviable. Creation theory only lacks an answer for light travel time, which is a problem to the philosophical naturalist, but not if God made the stars to be observed... seeing the deep field SHOULD help us prideful, brain dead humans understand that the term "God Almighty," an ubersuperlative (yes I made that up), is no exaggeration.

[357MagnumBob]

@maffhunt

Lisle did not claim these were the latest theories. He said these things are taught in most textbooks, which, of course, are typically way behind with this sort of thing.

And what else are you trying to imply? That all of these problems are solved? Are you saying the horizon and the flatness problems are solved? Does this "transition" theory make sweeping terrific predictions, or does it sound more like geocentric "epicycles" than sound theory?

[maffhunt]

From the very beginning he starts off with out of date science!! The notion that we expanded from a singularity went out in the 1980's, now we know that the sign of a singularity in our models is a sign that the model is incomplete. Now the idea is that the initial big bang is as transition point from one state to another which leads to the idea of something before the big bang, this idea has been around for a while but Lisle ignores that. Typical creationist dishonesty.

[MrWhadayaknow]

@TacoBurgher327 Well Tacoburgher, that's fine for you, but I like to hear everything a person has to say on the topic, particularly if I made the effort to begin the investigation in the first place. But to each his own. Hopefully you found a passtime more suited to your intellectual curiosity, perhaps a video game? Nice analogy, not.