solaris

few scenes from solaris

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• solaris
• tarkovsky

[nebby6]

I much prefer this 1972 version to the Soderbergh one. I couldn't believe that the new one omitted perhaps the most important monologue that the story had to offer. That, and the actress in the original was extremely convincing.

[Veronikiux]

No se puede comparar la Solaris de Tarkovsky con la versión de Soderbergh. Tarkovsky es un poeta y un innovador. Soderbergh maquila cine y hasta la idea del remake revela la falta de imaginación de Hollywood

[sheepinavacuum]

Funny how this film is compared to Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey when it is far closer to his vision of Stephen King’s The Shining in its atmosphere, direction and themes.

[lenesu86]

@loopiewho Your comment is retarded. You must have totally missed the point of Tarkovsky's film.

[newguy90]

Tarkovsky believed Solaris was a failure because he felt the sci-fi elements overshadowed the themes he wanted to explore. He didn't set out to make a science fiction movie, he only wanted to use it as a backdrop for his own ideas. He felt he got it right with Stalker.

[rocketman1179]

i haven't seen this one. I saw some comments below, can anyone explain what part of the story was in the old version that is missing from the new one, I would appreciate it.

[lealtadperonista]

adhiero

[Eikinkloster]

la version del 2002 es una porqueria quando comparada con la de el gran tarkovsky.

[pablo1835rigel]

Me gusta la version solariana del año 2002.

[2Patricia1]

what is this about?

[bennihana123]

I much prefer the 2002's planet and music, but the 1972 version is a better film.