47: Misandry - Intimacy

Exploration of male psychology and men's relation to women particularly as regards emotional support. Looks at pornography and the role of men in society. Examines how men are intentionally divided from children and each other.

What are the consequences of society's demonisation of men?

• Man's inhumanity to man
• Men refuse to defend themselves
• Act like a man!
• Is it gay for men to hold hands?
• Are men more dependent on women than women are on men?
• Men's identity
• Why won't women leave men alone?
• TV is a female-thing
• What does it take to be a strong man?
• The abuse industry charities government and the attack on intimacy

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Misandry
• NSPCC
• Feminism
• homophobia
• child
• abuse
• Industry
• paedophile
• man
• bashing
• pornography
• Sharon
• Osbourne
• Lorena
• Bobbit
• genital
• mutilation

[sidvidkid]

Porn works on the macro level, the social controllers use it as a tool to enhance mens slavery to an idealised version of femininity. It destabilises relationships and dehumanises all involved. This is where the interests of the controllers and the femininsts diverge. The feminists believe that they personally control men and so see porn as a threat. But they dont personally control men, they are just tools themselves. its the generalised programmed meme of woman in mans mind that controls him

[manwomanmyth]

@sidvidkid I don;t agree that porn (or 'erotica', as it should be called were it not vilified) is used against men. As I said in the film - porn is positive.

I do agree that women have become tools of other interests because they are so easy to manipulate. Just look at Obama speaking on women's issues. He'll give women a few compliments; he'll say how strong women are; how he owes everything to his single mother; how women have it rough. Cue applause, big smiles and female votes.

[GetMeThere1]

I can't believe the laughter at the comedian at minute 40; everything he was saying was LITERALLY TRUE (or even WORSE than he depicted)--and it's NOT funny.

[manwomanmyth]

@GetMeThere1 It is true and very far from funny. However, Bill Burr does a great job there of highlighting a massive problem. He is extremely astute and he's definitely a barely undercover MRA. His sort of work is useful even though he makes light of it.

[manwomanmyth]

@Zerafinel Wow. You don't seem to understand that you have commented in the wrong place; you took a wrong turn somewhere.

Tales of mythical female epiphanies and fantastic stories of desperate women 'finding themselves' (under the boot of oppression, no less) were probably destined for the Disney channel, or some other place promoting works of fiction.

This channel, that you have wandered onto by mistake, does not buy the tired Feminist inventions of female oppression. Better luck elsewhere.

[cracer112]

Your videos are EPIC. A real eye-opener. Men need to wake up and take a look around. We are lost.

[lantenec]

The stuff about children and men is quite interesting. I've thought about that before but never realized to what extent it's true. The first thing that popped in my mind was all those recent riots in England, hello! Plus I've been hearing absolute horror stories (I'm from the states) about the whole "yob" thing on the streets. Is it as bad as it sounds there?

[luckybozo1]

@MaxxTheMerciless That's right, make a big deal about being wronged and you become a celebrity. Nothing to do with right and wrong and fairness, everything to do with being offended personally which changes from person to person. You can't even argue against it!

[ultraverydeepfield]

we now live in a spiral where states try to protect the future of their society.

this is by trying to bring some stability. Not by doing what is right, but by doing what is possible.

Take a couple that has childern. One that is working, the other that is taking care of children.

If they split up, it is obvious, that the one working will have to support for the one taking care of the childern, and the childern, even when they split.

[ultraverydeepfield]

36:40

there you go.

men want short term satisfaction (sex), and to get that have to invest in long term projects (jobs).

women want long term satisfaction (support), and get that by investing in short term projects (make up).

it's jobs that are hard to get, its jobs that you can make a cereer, and it's jobs that you earn money. the incentive for men to get a job is very high, not so for a women.

That is why this gap between men and women will stay the same for a long time to come.

[ultraverydeepfield]

35:30

men are under a lot of stress. from the age of 13, men learn that no one cares for them but they have to care for others. If a man is interested in a girl, he has to do the first move.

A man that is stranded, knows that cleaning and washing will not make his situation really better. He is thinking that he is stranded, that he needs to find a job again.

Take the same man and turn him into a women, and you know, society and men wont let him (her) down.

[ultraverydeepfield]

32:20

men will stay in the dark ages if men do not start to understand, that they have to school young men about their own needs, and how they can get what they want, without making them slaves to women and society.

That is missing in our todays society. No one is talking to young men about what is happening to them, and that they should demand also adjusted treatment. We all know, that when men begin to demand what suits them best, as women already do, it will colllapse.

[ultraverydeepfield]

32:30

and there are reasons what this is so. why is no one talking about WHY men are in the dark ages. when you realize why, it's quite simple, that it will need a change in thinking of all men, and that is almost not possible.

Think of yourself being a women, and you know, you can take care of only yourself. A man will come along and take try to be with you, even if you nag. this added freedom you can use to establish talking only about your needs. solutuion: men have to stop wanting women.

[sidvidkid]

In a world of psychopathic competitive groups it appears on the surface that individualism is less powerful and so people reject it for the safety and convenience of groupthink. But groupthink is psychopathic and inhuman.

It is only individualism which can defuse all the psychopathy and madness of our world, and get people back into a place where they rely on their own innate conscience and talents. Its not going to be easy, but individualism is our only hope for a return to sanity.

[sidvidkid]

As feminism destroys itself the social controllers will transfer their attention back onto men. They will try and tell us we are some sort of group so they can provide leadership of the group and a set of principles and rules, which will be an attempt to usurp our innate conscience and humanity.

We must all resist the temptations of group identity, and be individuals, strong in our sense of self purpose and self reliance.

Collectivism = death of the individual = what social controllers want

[sidvidkid]

I reject the idea in this video that men thinking and acting like individuals is a bad thing. This is the essence of life, development, acheivement and invention.

Collectivism is a BAD thing. Collectivism is a mental illness where people give up their rational intellect and conscience and give thier allegiance to a group.

This is why feminism destroyed women it made them irrational it usurped their conscience and destroyed compassion and men stopped being individual people & became "the enemy".