FOX ATTACKS the ENVIRONMENT

Why all the bitching about a negative report?

you fundamentalist warmers have had the news media onside from day 1.
Complete and total bias from the likes of the bbc et al yet you dont whine about that cos it suits your idiotic aims.

The truth is out there and it aint warming and it aint man made...but it is "mann made".

The scam stops here.

Lol, so basically Fox News is admitting they're being run by their advertisers? You gotta be kidding me! go figure!

faux-news could easily make additional money world wide,
by streaming on comedy channels.
it is pure gold.

Typical Faux news tripe! Now even more ridiculous than a year ago as new facts are revealed.

"When people know what the truth is the will feel deceived by science and scientists"
Dr. Kiminori Itoh, Phd UN IPCC Scientist Award-winning environmental physical chemist

"It doesnt matter what is true, it only matters wheat people believe is true"
Paul Watson, Co-founder of Greenpeace

"we need to get some broad based support, to capture the publics imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest."
Stephen
Schneider Stanford professor of climatology, Lead author on many IPCC reports.

I completely agree with Fox your so called science is junk science... Solar activity is the only logical answer to any presved global warming for which there is very little evidence. also polar ice caps are melting because true north is moving into Canada accross the land and away from the water. But polar bears swimming is a great ploy.

ok , so far this expertise goes,
but wassup with the co2 level in the atmosphere? isn`t it higher than ewar?

the only logical answer? you clearly havent evaluated nor possess the knowledge of the multitude of contributing factors that coincide with solar activity (you might want to note that scientists have reported a lack of activity in our sun at that so you can shove that shit up your ass). the "solar activity" you speak of should be more appropriately explained. its the entrance of excess uv radiation which permeates the atmosphere not simply sunlig

and i guess its not illogical to label chemists, biologists, meterologists, climatologists as all "so called" scientists for those areas of study are surely joke scientific categories. its far more logical to suggest only one of many possible theories which is no more likely than the others which possess better evidence, yea thats way more logical