@CinemaEnthusiast93 The RED and ARRI cameras are designed as motion picture cameras, whereas the 3300 is designed for broadcast purposes. The simple matter of form factor is a big issue; the 3300 is a typical shoulder mounted/ENG style, whereas the RED would require a whole support rig or a tripod. They're all fantastic cameras, it's just a matter of being fir for purpose.
@chrisoakleyfx Oh I see. :)
CinemaEnthusiast93 2 weeks ago
@CinemaEnthusiast93 The RED and ARRI cameras are designed as motion picture cameras, whereas the 3300 is designed for broadcast purposes. The simple matter of form factor is a big issue; the 3300 is a typical shoulder mounted/ENG style, whereas the RED would require a whole support rig or a tripod. They're all fantastic cameras, it's just a matter of being fir for purpose.
chrisoakleyfx 3 weeks ago
So, why not just use the arri alexa or red which have higher resolution? What separates this camera from the rest?
CinemaEnthusiast93 3 weeks ago
And this, my firend, is Sony
SWATPhantom 4 months ago
Next we'll have these characteristics on consumer-level camcorders. How exciting!
andreipetunin 9 months ago
cool, they used the hdc1500 on some parts of avatar too
dfgoijoi 2 years ago
VÉNDEME!
ROCKYRACCON01 2 years ago
What is the bit rate of the HDC 3300 ? Does it implies a different approach of filming ? or not necessarily ?
soufianDEMOS 2 years ago
Ok I want one for xmas now :D
spongah 2 years ago
Cool camera, cool video, and GREAT camera work on that goal!
wrinkledsack 3 years ago