NO INCOME TAX LAW FORMER "IRS" AGENT JOE BANNISTER PART 3

Joe Bannister explains in a interveiw the 2 year investigation he did, resulted in the IRS forcing him to resign.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• IRS
• ED
• AND
• ELAINE
• BROWN
• INCOME
• TAX
• ILLEGAL
• FEDRAL
• RESERVE
• INVESTIGATION
• ALEX
• JONES
• INFOWARS

[InIJah]

holy young alex jones batman lol

[neilengen]

great clip .. keep it up thanks

[Tubeusercomm]

The IRS Chief Counsel and DoJ attorneys compete to get cases such as this.

These slam-dunks add in nicely to the win-loss record which helps determine their annual bonus.

[Tubeusercomm]

The court ordered that the names, addresses, telephone numbers, e-mail addresses and Social Security numbers of every person who received materials on how to stop paying taxes be turned over to the government.

The District Court issued an order holding We the People Foundation in contempt of court, imposing fines of $2,000 per day.

On May 5, 2008, Schulz filed a document with the court asserting that he had turned the material over to the United States attorney's office earlier that day.

[durango64]

WHEN IT IS ALL SAID AND DONE GIVE A COPY OF YOUR CERTIFICATE FO EXEMPTION FROM WITHOLDING IN LIEU OF FORM W-4, AND A AFFIDAVIT OF TAX-EXEMPT FOREIGN STATUS....

[kbleuel]

@kubush It has become quite clear that you are misinformed and like the general public are swayed not by fact, but by who can more eloquently deliver his argument.

you are interested only in a battle of intellect. in fact I don't even think that you truly believe what you are arguing about. I bet you would try to persuade me into thinking that the Federal Reserve is a Federal agency.

[prof5string]

@dude58677 The most likely reason the word "direct" was rejected is that Congress wanted to repudiate the Supreme Court's Pollock decision, in which a tax on investment income was held to be a direct tax on the underlying property. Use of the word "direct" might have implied that the Court's reasoning was sound, which it wasn't.

[prof5string]

@dude58677 Wages were taxed long before the 16th Amendment under the power granted by Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution.

[kubush]

@dude58677 Stop trying to shift the burden of proof.

"I'M DONE HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

You conceded, therefor you lost the debate. It's funny how the highest point in your argument was "BAWAWAWAWAWA..." LOL. Good luck not paying your taxes.

[dude58677]

@kubush

Yep, you porve my point. Name calling, arrogant debating, shifting the burden of proof on me(I went in detail about how the 16th amendment history refutes your bogus theory about wage taxes being constitutioinal BTW), and you call it all bullshit?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!! BAWAWAWWAWWAWAWAAAAWAWAWA!!!!!­!!! YOU LOST THE DEBATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'M DONE HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!