How Ideological Subversion of the Retail Investor Enables Financial Fraud, EP01
Top Comments
All Comments (12)
-
This video is far too deep for many people. The analysis of feminism is brilliant. It was actually even more subtle. Initially families were better off with two incomes. This accelerated women into the workplace. This surplus income led to the following:
1. Increased spending on consumer goods
2. Invisible loss of income
3. Increased exposure of children to TV advertising (unsupervised)
TV has been a powerful tool in shaping minds
-
nice analysis, im going to watch al your vids.
-
The reason brokers do not want you to invest in physical gold and silver is because they will not make any fees from it.
-
These are great, I have been reading your blog since late 2008 and watching your vids.
-
The double income hypothesis will lead to the soothsayers demise as the truth thereof will inundate one in hate ridden blame. History shows this repeatedly. The vehement chastisement I have received for theorizing this since 10th grade never ends. Bravo, thumbs up.
-
Thanks for the effort on the videos so far. I think that if you are going to build any credibility here, you are going to ither support claims with evidence or not make them. Could you provide some evidence on this Banker/Feminism hypothesis?
-
Thanks for doing these videos I greatly appreciate them.
-
Awesome! Thank you so much for getting this info out and into the mix!!!
-
Excellent evaluation...thanks!
@TheTopBloke we don't believe it's a conspiracy either. however, there is a considerable difference between deliberate, conscious schemes being the root of this current global monetary crisis and incompetence. we happen to believe it's the former v. the latter.
smartknowledgeu 1 year ago 3