Apple WWDC 2005-The Intel Switch Revealed

ROFL
ROFL
ROFL
Osx has been "pc " (INETL compat) for 8-9 YEARS
HA HA HA HA ROFL LOL ROFL LOL

Actually, the Intel x86 processors today have RISC and CISC aspects. In some instances the x86 chip "translates" CISC code into RISC-like micro-ops and then back to CISC code. As processors have ramped up in overall speed, CISC has moved a bit towards RISC and vice versa, so as I understand things, the instruction set is blurred as compared to back in the mid-1990's when there were clear distinctions between RISC and CISC.

Apple has announced that PowerPC was up to twice as fast as its Intel. Apple switched to Intel but Has Apple Been Lying to Us???

For the last 12 years, we've been hearing how the RISC architecture (found in PowerPC) was so much better than the CISC architecture (used in Intel's x86 family) - and now, after all this time, Apple is abandoning that?

What the hell are you talking about???This video is from
2005

@tseng45: Power PC has been faster. But, over the period powerpc needed more power and lot of heat is generated and IBM couldn't deliver a PowerPC mobile chip with 3 Ghz. So, Apple has not choice but to intel. And, also intel core 2 duo and quad are good enough. But, Mac pro has a Xeon chips and not a desktop. In mac world Mac pro is considered the highend desktop . Not every who buys Mac pro runs Mac OS X server. They use Mac OS X desktop version

Already possible to run it so no transition will be made.

that's not an iMac

Its a cinema display