"philosophical reasoning" is not enough to prove the existence of a deity,"
Its an argument it using science etc. so why not (100th time) there deductive arguments if the premises are true so is the coclusion it doesn't matter whether you like it or not , if you want to escape the conxlusion you need to falsify a premise.
Also, "philosophical reasoning" is not enough to prove the existence of a deity, you also need the "Scientific proof" as well, to complete your argument, otherwise half your data is missing and your formula is incomplete.
E=m.... is missing the rest of your equation. capisce?
This guys knows it all!!! / Knows fuck all
tbradders 33 minutes ago
No.. just no!
TheKoodude7 5 hours ago
@Aydosh1991
Whats more pathetic is that thousands of people clapping for him. lol
Can you imagine how uneducated " those " people are?!!!
:)D yet, they claim they know best. !!!!!
PersianWiseMan1 10 hours ago
This guy dodges like a champ.
VesusSheist 1 day ago
I'm sure John was created..... flaw in that argument
TooPhatProd 3 days ago
What a pathetic answer.
Aydosh1991 3 days ago
@PersianWiseMan1 Inshallah I hope so that it is done :)
koolgoose2 4 days ago
Only the brainwashed could be happy with this answer.
scoterf 4 days ago
@PersianWiseMan1
"philosophical reasoning" is not enough to prove the existence of a deity,"
Its an argument it using science etc. so why not (100th time) there deductive arguments if the premises are true so is the coclusion it doesn't matter whether you like it or not , if you want to escape the conxlusion you need to falsify a premise.
lxAgnosticxl 5 days ago
@lxAgnosticxl
Look your argument MUST be simple and short.
Also, "philosophical reasoning" is not enough to prove the existence of a deity, you also need the "Scientific proof" as well, to complete your argument, otherwise half your data is missing and your formula is incomplete.
E=m.... is missing the rest of your equation. capisce?
PersianWiseMan1 5 days ago