Fire ravages Beijing building

Feb. 9 - Fire consumed a building in Beijing that formed part of Central China Television's new headquarters as residents set off fireworks throughout the city to celebrate the Lantern Festival on Monday evening.

Flames 20-30 feet (10 meters) high shot out of the building, just north of the landmark CCTV tower designed by Dutch architect Rem Koolhaas. The flames were reflected in the tower, which itself appeared to be untouched. No one appeared to have been in the building, a policeman on the scene said, adding he had no immediate knowledge of any casualties. The destroyed building housed the Mandarin Oriental hotel in eastern Beijing, which was supposed to open in 2009. The fire department did not immediately comment on the suspected cause of the blaze.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Fire
• ravages
• Beijing
• building

[djjnuk]

@MetalSanke no just the ones that back up the fact that buildings dont turn to dust from a fire.

the truth must be known and we will never stop until it comes out.

i dont kno about u but the truth about the biggest terrorist attack in history is pretty important to me

[djjnuk]

@newdad1107 lastly, watch the videos and read the reports from on the day. the people who were there and experienced it first hand, they all point to the official story being wrong or at least incomplete. at the WTC there are firemen, police, news reporters and witnesses all saying bombs were exploding in there.

there are stacks of evidence concerning every aspect of 9/11 that cant be explained by the official story. whether u believe in a conspiracy or not, the evidence shouldnt be ignored 

[djjnuk]

@newdad1107 u should also look at the facts, science and expert architects and engineers opinions who say the buildings couldnt have collapsed just from fire. building 7 fell to dust in about 10 seconds and wasnt hit by a plane. how can all those thousands of tonnes of solid steel turn to dust from a few small fires in a matter of seconds? it cant. and thats not just common sense, its scientific fact.

[djjnuk]

@newdad1107 have u thoroughly researched 9/11 yourself?

if not then id advise u to.

u say how could all the explosives be installed without anyone noticing...people did notice. there were power downs and workmen would come in. security was lowered, ownership changed, and bomb sniffing dogs were removed from the WTC wks prior to 9/11. and the security company for the WTC was run by george bushs brother.

if the bush admin wanted to rig the buildings with explosives they could have

[MetalSanke]

Wow, are you idiots going to compare every fire to 9/11? LOL

[newdad1107]

I've seen it and once again anybody can put anything on the internet citing a website isnt citing shit. And since you wont disclose something that should already be readily public information says that you're full of shit. Tell me how dumb do you feel knowing you have to lie to argue your point of view.

[WTFaboutWTC7]

If you sincerely haven't seen the material that's on AE911TRUTH org I advise you to do so and Watch?v=rW6Oez7pag0 for example.

And I don't have to prove you anything.

You can take my word for it that I'm also an engineer. It's actually a pretty rude question. "I'm waiting..."

But you don't have to answer my question.

It's okay. I know the answer.

Have a nice one.

Cheers.

[newdad1107]

Something from a newspaper or book preferrably anyone can put anything on the net. Speaking of which, since you are an engineer you could easily prove that, could you provide your professional license number all engineers have to work in the engineering field? Then I can look you up in the registry and everything will be settled. Even without a degree you are required to have one. Im waiting....

[WTFaboutWTC7]

Funny for you to ask that. On the site AE911truth org you can find a few architects and engineers who support this theory. Or do you lable these as conspiracy theorists?

And, yes I'm an engineer also. For over 20 years now at the same company. Without a degree!!!! But with just as much or maybe even more knowledge as colleagues of mine with a degree.

You still haven't answered my question...

[newdad1107]

So what makes you qualified to make that assessment? Are you a demolitions expert? A structural or civil engineer? What experience do you have with structural steel? What about your knowledge of buildings built to withstand sheer loads? Fire engineering? Anything besides a youtube video to back up your statements?