[HD] Djokovic vs Tsonga Australian Open 2010 QF Highlights

Highlights NOT made by me...credits go the person who did it !!!

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Djokovic
• vs
• Tsonga
• Australian
• Open
• 2010
• QF
• HD
• Grand
• Slam
• WorldTennis
• Master
• Class
• Hard
• Court
• Serbia
• France
• Match
• Amazing
• Points
• Forehand
• Backhand
• Winner
• Highlights
• Tennis
• High
• Level
• Set
• Downlaod
• Slow
• Motion
• Replay
• Cut
• Mic
• Finals
• Nadal
• Federer
• Cup

[apun94]

@kmccary are you serious??? You really havent watched djokovic playing this year... Even if tsonga has an overall head to head against djokovic, djoker will dominate tsonga from now on. AND are you kidding me??? tsonga infinitely more talented??? REALLY???

[THEJACKSONVILLE1200]

TSONGA IS GOING TO HAVE A BIG 2012 HOPEFULLY

[lunaretic3]

@apun94

infinitely.

[nathrox2]

God I love his celebration

[whoopyourarse]

its crazy how tsonga has never won a major with so much natural talent

[ExootiKz]

Ont dit pas Joke a vic mais Djokovic...

[thisnamealsotaken]

@Gunthix209 hahahaha how is saying results count biased?? one would think the only thing thats not biased are results. ur problem is that the results of ur fave player are in danger so u look for other things to hold on to. iv said it many times to fed fans and ill say it again; let it go, if nadal surpasses him then thats his achievement he deserves, if not then all kudos to fed. but in the end the result is the only thing that matters, never forget that.

[Gunthix209]

@thisnamealsotaken I don't hate Nadal, just saying he's not the best because he gets injured too often, not mastering the game like others do. And your reasoning of ''only results count'' is biased. Say Djoko has 20-0 victories on clay vs X, while X has 5-0 victories on grass vs Djoko for and overall 5-20, does it mean Djoko is the best by results? No, only means he's better on clay. Results, INJURIES, consistency, technique are facts you have to consider

[Stylaz21]

@thisnamealsotaken you actually blocked me for having another opinion? Truth hurts he, pathetic fanboy.

[thisnamealsotaken]

@Gunthix209 no I'm not, and I'm actually tired of defending that dude. general rule of thumb is that the most hated one is the best one, so i actually can understand it now. and ur reasoning is one of the most ridiculous ones i have ever heard, and trust me i heard some crazy ones (nadal plays ugly, nadal is doping, fed lost cus he got kids lol, fed lost cus it was dark, fed lost cus he had too many unf errors etc etc). like i said to keep it simple; only results count.

[Gunthix209]

@thisnamealsotaken You're wrong here. Not only results that count, but also how they achieve it. Nadal has been injured way too much to be considered the best, i don't know how many times, FO09,knee,Wimb09,knee, USO 09, abs, AO 10, knee, etc. That's pretty ridiculous. From my perspective, if you win but get yourself injured, you still have failed. Think about it, Fed=lots GS no injuries, Nadal=lots GS and injuries, Djoko=not many GS and injuries. I think djoko/fed are better

[Stylaz21]

@thisnamealsotaken Fed also become worse from 2008 on when Nadal became number one. Fed, Murray and Djoko weren't in their prime when Nadal started playing better.