Chernobyl 2007 - Reactors 5 & 6
Uploader Comments (dazoldham)
Top Comments
-
wasn't it reactor 4 that blew up?
-
please ignore this imbecile
All Comments (89)
-
@Stahlfraust yes
-
I guess I'll have to a more hazardous place to prance around.
-
@HWGuyEG Oh its prefectly safe now
-
@connectico Snow can't be radioactive, the heat of radioactivity would probably melt the snow.
-
Why the hell would you go there to chernobyl, its a ghost city so there's nothing to see its i geuss kinda boring,
P.S.
Is the snow radioactive there??
-
@dazoldham So how far where you from the 4th reactor, the one that blew up??
Because i thougth you had to have anti rad suits to go anywhere near Chernobyl
-
@Stahlfraust yes
-
I want to go there
-
@protector1990 ah right i forgot about the mishap with reactor 2 but 1 and 3 are potentially operatable if the ukrainian govt decides 2 restart them
-
@killman369547 I think reactor number 2 is not operational, I've read something about reactor number 2 broke down beyond repair in something like 1992 and it was shut down permanently. I don't know about reactor 1...
If I had a heavy rad suit I'd love to prance around there.
Lead-lined PVC suits are awesome.
HWGuyEG 2 years ago 3
You don't need one!!
dazoldham 2 years ago 3
How long were you allowed to stay?
Tabby266 2 years ago
We were there for a full day - it was part of a guided trip
dazoldham 2 years ago