RE: HTWW STFU

Chill out.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• How
• The
• World
• Works
• philosophy
• economics
• social

[outsidemendham]

Shut the fuck up!

[ZangaroZen]

@BorgKing001, sure libertarianism is a never existed utopia, and Lee Doren is a corporate imperialist, hardly a libertarian, but a shill for big corporate/rich interests.

[BorgKing001]

@ZangaroZen Libertarianism hasn't been tried, HTWW isn't a libertarian

[XxGonixXFAN]

You should have cited where EXACTLY you found the quotes. By the way, please shave and get a decent haircut. You look like a caveman, no offense.

[ZangaroZen]

@TallMan87, about you:

A) I've yet to meet a libertarian that wasn't a free-loading impractical dreamer. Where in world history has libertarianism ever worked?

B) Your assert Lee Doren is "a brilliant guy" and "he'll own you...he will rip those studies in half and then use them for TP". So name an original Doren idea (ie not plagarized from Friedman, Sowell, etc), and a Doren position that's not pro-corporate imperialism. You can't.

C) You're an arts student?

[ZangaroZen]

(con't)

7. You say "I don't need to look at a study of social security to say I disagree with it...my moral convictions", and that's your core issue. Like HTWW you're closed to evidence, basic facts, etc, preferring loud empty opinions that suit you.

8. You take offense to "scientists [consider] philosophy as entertainment", so name a scientific theory based on philosophy, you can't.

9. You insist "science isn't everything", just the focus of JW's video not BS opinions presented as fact

[ZangaroZen]

(con't) Scientists do science not philosophers. BASIC

5. You say "economics is more than science", which doesn't address the JW statement of economists "who do it well treat it as a science" not a philosophy.

6. You made up this quote "you said...if the numbers cruch if it comes out positive... roll with it... morality and philosophy should[n't] be included", JW actually said "we have the evidence, and the math, we make predictions and it matches" (con't)

[ZangaroZen]

(con't) you confuse HTWW's empty opinions/philosophy stated as fact with JW stated focus on actual "evidence/math". BASIC

3. You say "debaters and scientists are one in the same...I went to nationals in my senior year in debate", LOL, therefore "not to brag" you are a qualified scientist? No.

4. You disagree with "[scientific] arguements should not include philosophy" as it "crowding other people out", consider NAZIsm's aryan philosophy and it's corruption of science. (con't)

[ZangaroZen]

@TallMan87, your rebutal is 3 times longer than the source video. Let's get to:

1. You claim JW is "hating on people" to make up for "lacking educational content", fact is JW notes the name "HowTheWorldWorks" is pretencious and ironic for "someone who apparently understands very little about how the world works" and backs up that observation.

2. You dishonestly misquote JW as saying "Scientists never debate or argue", when the actual quote is "don't argue/debate that way" (con't)