911 Most Photographed Victim (victimes le plus photographié, víctimas más fotografiados)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
158,824
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.

Uploaded by on Apr 24, 2011

Dropped from Wikipedia. Not mentioned at wikileaks. Never noticed at cryptome.

The woman in the plane shaped hole that we refer to as Edna Cintron appears in nearly every 9/11 NIST 911 document. As demonstrated with this cropped, slowed and zoomed Jim Huibregtse video (NIST FOIA release), she appeared at the plane shaped hole 3 floors below where she worked no later than 8:46 (yes, before NTSB
ntsb.gov/info/Flight_%20Path_%20Study_AA11.pdf
http://www.ntsb.gov/info/Flight_%20Path_%20Study_AA11.pdf
said wtc1 was attacked), standing in the plane shaped hole seeking help until her death when WTC1 was demolished with her still there, pleading. Despite being in so many photographs, she has been ignored in every official investigation/analysis of 9/11. She is never mentioned by name nor reference. Mention of her by name and her image were available on Wikipedia several years ago.

Now she is gone from wikipedia, and, of course, the US archive which appears to avoid archiving criminal evidence.

Of note is the fact that Mark Kendall Bingham has his own page at wikipedia. There are no real images of him.

Barbara Olson, who the FBI assures us did not talk to her lying husband Ted (the solicitor general of the United States of America under George dubiya Bush), has her own page at wikipedia. Like Mark Bingham, there are no images of her and, in her case, the plane she presumably rode in, never took off.

Edan Cintron, photographed hundreds of times with hours of video. She rates a zero in the official documents and now at wikipedia. Reasonably good chance she is a real victim of the crime committed on September 11 2001. Webfairy and Joe Craine think so.

Wikipedia also does not mention the most famous shot in Television history; the WNYW (What New Yorkers Watch) HIGH 5 live shot of the WTC2 impact (UA 175). I am sure there is a factual reason for that.

Joe Craine's comments included here as the audio overlay are part of the historical record from before CNN911Fakes started uploading videos for Joe Craine. Since YouTube erased more than 10,000 pertinent comments (including these concerning the victim Edna Cintron) made by JoeCraine01 (Joe Craine's first YouTube account, totally obliterated in the Halloween Massacre of 2007) in the pre-video days, these are included to supplement the historical record. When you find comments on blogs and from other sources referring to "Crazy Joe Craine" talking to a dead woman, it is these, and some others that are quite similar, those comments refer to. Joe Craine is a moonbat; she continues to fight a battle against powers far stronger than she is. May justice and peace prevail.

The only reality of 911 was TV fakery.
Everything else we were shown on TV was false.
At the pentagon it was faked firefighting.
Joe Craine, YouTube Martyr

911 victimes le plus photographié
911 víctimas más fotografiados

Barbara, Do what you will, Dad 93 93/93

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (CNN911Fakes)

  • Conspiracy theorists are idiots. Enough said.

  • @lisamarieindc Indeed. I am surprised you were able to spell all those words correctly.

    But, there is a neat characteristic of research, which I am sure you have not yet started; if the propositions are wrong, they will quickly fail. If they are right, the more research the more one finds supporting them.

    Over 300 videos from intensive research; never even a hint of error.

    Thanks for visiting and posting a comment.

Top Comments

  • Who identified this woman as "Edna Cintron" and why isn't she listed on the Social Security Death Index as dying on 9/11?

    We were told that 3,000 people died on 9/11. However, I find it extremely disturbing that MOST of the 9/11 "victims" including the firefighters DO NOT show up on the Social Security Death Index as dying on 9/11. How do I know this? I checked it myself.

  • Is this the woman version of Steven Hawkins?

see all

All Comments (309)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @lmfecher Thanks. Appreciation and encouragement are what keep the machine running! YT/Google is hiding me these days, so it's a little discouraging. I suppose it will be worse once the improvements are fully implemented.

  • @CNN911Fakes

    By the way, keep up the good work!! I enjoy your videos very much. ;-)

  • @CNN911Fakes

    Don't forget that UA 175 was reported by the MSM as still in the air flying around AFTER WTC 2 had been "hit" by it!!

    I don't think they'll adjust the SSDI stats anytime soon. Why should they when the majority of the sheeple still believe the "official story"?

  • @lmfecher Your tolerance is amazing! But I realize we may be the crest of the "fix the SSDI problem" wave

    Do you recall they obliterated the take offs and landings database when the fact that neither AA plane ever took off on 9/11. They retroactively repaired the "planes in service" database when people discovered that all 4 planes were still certified.

    Clearly, SSDI will adjust the stats soon, based on the balderdash your foil has been saying. They will claim they were prohibitted by law!

  • @thegirl44

    You're curious why it's taking so long to declare the victims legally dead? LMFAO! Seriously? The government still won't mention Building 7!

  • @thegirl44

    If all these people weren't declared dead by a coroner or by the government, then please explain to me why they aren't listed as missing? Why would they say that they've identifed the dead through DNA, but not DECLARE them dead? Dead, but not listed as dead? Why would they be listed on many 9/11 victims' lists and why would they erect a multi-million dollar monument to them at Ground Zero?

    Government bought and paid for coroners. Reminds me of the whole JFK bullshit story.

  • @lmfecher

    Part 4

    Another example where this lengthy process of declaring someone legally dead happens is in an ocean plane crash where the bodies can't be recovered. All the evidence is there that makes it reasonable to assume that no one on board survived but you still have to have your loved one declared legally dead.

    It really is the idiotic formality that I'm sure you have it pegged as but it's a formality put in place to legally protect people in my line of work.

  • @lmfecher

    Part 3

    The government is the entity responsible for declaring these victims. They would send the SSDI a declaration stating that the person is dead in lieu of a coroner's cert. . I don't know why the government wouldn't have bypassed the standard formality of a certain amount of time having to have passed before issuing the declaration in this circumstance but they haven't.

    It's an embarrassing bureaucratic blunder, to be sure, try not to read anything into it beyond that.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more