Cancer - The Forbidden Cures
Uploader Comments (carlcun1979)
Top Comments
-
This forum is now full of trolls... they (FDA, NCi... etc) those motherfucker are not gods, so fuck'em all and don't pay attention to them!! most of my family is dying because of you assholes are trying to change the subject of the "conversation" and all the ppl believe in you, the facts that really matters are that you know that cancer is curable, so FUCK YOU AND GET OUT TROLLS ! Don't pay attention to those fucking trolls. Is good an NEEDED that ppl try other methods to try to get well
-
PEOPLEEEEEEEEEE
Don't pay attention to @peki100 he is just trying to put out of interest what really matters!!! he is just a payed troll. Don't feed him by don't paying attention to him!!! he will die alone!!
WE NEED DIFFERENT METHODS TO OBTAIN NEW RESULTS.
FUCK OFF NCI
FUCK OFF FDA
FUCK OFF CANCER
All Comments (79)
-
@BlueMonstter homeopathy is proven not to work, vitamins and herbs are. FDA and pharmaceutical companies are corrupt but we must agree that many medicines come from herbs and natural minerals and chemicals around us.
-
I could be wrong, but arent a lot of studies controlled by the government? If so, how do we expect to get the other side of the story? Maybe it works maybe it doesn't, but how can we know if the study is controlled and monitored by only one group?? That goes for any group at that, not just government sponsored ones.
-
That said, I will not stomach bullshit peddling itself as science under the guise that there is some sort of suppression of information. The burden of proof is on you to prove your claims, and it always will be. Until you can substantiate basic claims without then being torn apart via contradictory evidence, you'll just be a bunch of nutters bitching about seeds.
-
But then we continue on with the banality of accusing everyone of being a shill or a sheep. To that end I say you're simply illogical, don't know the first thing about burden of proof, and couldn't carry a debate without resorting to a strawman or red herring if your life depended on it.
I am by no means opposed to natural medicines. I think nature is our best hope for finding cures for disease, and I'm avidly in opposition to the mass medication going on [cont...]
-
Or rather, you'll go onto some bollocks about "fear", continuing this typical line of conspiracy. There's one reason, and one reason alone that you do not see evidence for this in peer-review journals - it lacks even the slightest modicum of research and data. Nearly every single source of information I find regarding Laetrile ultimately cites Krebs' "research". This is the staple game of pseudo-science.
-
Actually, I'd be the person talking about how stupid their religious beliefs were, which would probably get me burned at the stake.
I like science, and skepticism. I like peer-review, data, and empiricism. Right, the whole of the hundreds of thousands of independent, autonomous, self and inter-competing individuals somehow have ALL been paid to parrot the exact same lines over and over again.
-
This is ignoring the fact, of course, that even though this substance supposedly prevents persons from getting cancer, and "cures" cancer, the mortality rate from cancer amongst traditionally living Inuit persons has exploded within the past 50 years.
Which just happens to coincide directly with the advent of POP and PCB compounds into their environment.
Fancy that
-
Right, so I'm supposed to believe that, even though the majority of Inuit people traditionally have lived at the northernmost parts of the state of AK, as well as the northernmost parts of Canada (around Hudson bay), predominantly in permafrost areas, that they consumed high amounts of a plant that grows exclusively on the west coast for roughly 4 months out of the year. And your evidence comes from studies of the Yup'Ik Inuit, who live mostly in the western part of AK.
-
@smnaotrt Excellent comments, the infintiemouth is just another troll mouthpeiece for the pharma industry, in a previous life time he was most likely one of the finger pointers when it came to the witch trials and the inquisition. Their 'peer reviewed' scientific dogma approach is rotten to the core, they do not seem to be able to comprehend that peers can be bought
-
@theinfinitemouth A)The comment regarding the Inuit is simply incorrect. Just one example of a food rich in nitrilosides that these people consume is Rubus spectabilis or salmonberries. This yearly harvest of salmonberries is mentioned in Eskimo essays which you can easily read on google books. Biomagnification is another way in which they would have gotten nitrilosides in their diet. Animals like caribou and reindeer feed on salmonberries and triglochin or arrowgrass
ah dude , my brother is an Homeopathic doctor , lol , i though he was an idiot to chose that field !
BlueMonstter 2 months ago
@BlueMonstter I think it will be the future my friend, medicine is to corrupted
carlcun1979 2 months ago
Hiroshima, Nagasaki, multiple nuclear test in the south west desert, chernobyl, fukushima... No fucking wonder the rate is high, and a 'mystery.'
pettyofficer30 2 months ago in playlist Must see 2
@pettyofficer30 Shouldnt it then also be high in china? Japan itself? and all the pacific islands too?
carlcun1979 2 months ago