Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Peter Singer's Ethics

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,550
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 27, 2010

In this short clip Peter Singer discusses the ethics of poverty and affluence, animal rights, and the radical nature of applied ethics.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I really wish this video was more popular :(

  • @CasparLeones No shit. I'm deleting that

  • @S2Cents That's a lot of cunts. Maybe you need to get some. Ease up a little.

  • @mendesb76 luxury businesses exist because demand for luxury items exist. if there was no demand for luxury items, those businesses would be selling economical items. Disagree with you

  • you have to understand that the luxury businesses create a lot of jobs as well. Disagree with you

  • I believe we have an obligation to make lots of money, therefore we can contribute alot to charity. Progress through economic means. What do you think, don't be afraid to let me know your opinion if you disagree!

  • The millionaire who buys one thousand dollar suits is going to have the ability to make those purchases but also contribute lots of money to charity. More money than the professor who talks about the moral obligation we have to not make large unnecessary purchases. It can be said that by making more money you are better able to help those who need the money you are able to contribute.

  • A dose of this guys videos a day is what can get people through the day as an ethical day :)

  • I agree with his statement at the end I do believe in a social meaning to life, not a literal meaning to life but even if society isn't a real force like gravity, it seems so real that its worth the meaning, its an illusion but no clear difference is noticeable so within this illusion of society he is correct.

  • hes definetly anti-female anti-metro

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more