Raid 0 - Velociraptors booting
Uploader Comments (jezekus)
Top Comments
-
What? Why are you charge me from that thing? I have NEVER saw you videos and NEVER voted with thumbs on them!
-
Maybe you got thumbs down because your're a twat?
All Comments (103)
-
@klausro201 - Antivirus is for noobs.
-
@Makeshoot Trim's for SSD, this are veloci's
-
I can't believe how bad and ignorant replies you have received to this video. Blind kids not knowing that WInXP 64 supports 8GB RAM, a kid getting orgasms over a 16:9 screen, a retard saying that Win XP breaks down HDD's in RAID, smartass saying how unimpressed he is over a performance uploaded 2 years ago...
-
I'm not as impressed as I thought I'd be...
-
OCZ REVO DRIVE chuck norris has one and it blends
-
@sonicfan7 im sorry but some people CAN buy a ssd :D
-
@TheNewbpowner123 To small, to expensive. FUCK THE SSD WHORES. I'll go with a Velociraptor 300gb x2 RAID 0 :P
-
it's new installation, it doesn't count ;p
8GB ram and using XP - LOL!
Phr33d0m 9 months ago
@Phr33d0m XP x64 - 64bit version of WIn XP Prof.
jezekus 9 months ago 4
Do not use raid on xp u will break ur hard drive... Its to slow still . I have 64 bit trim support win 7 c 300 its so fast ucant imagine. Doenst matter do not play with drive if doesnt support raid and trimm mY c300 suports ncq raid trim and more... HF
Makeshoot 1 year ago
@Makeshoot Break my HDD? Noo, there is no such a way I could break my HDD using it with Win XP x64. Velociraptors DOES have RAID, NCQ... support because they are enterprise storages. If drive doesnt support raid directly that doesnt mean it could be broken when it is used in RAID array.
jezekus 1 year ago 2
16:9 you can see much more and offers higher resolutions and multiple 4:3 dont even compare i remember thinking the 16;9 was stupid when i was 11 lol because i didnt understand it but now i just cant go back do they even make 4:3 monitors anymore nope you may find a place to buy them but production has stopped on every consumer display 4:3 i THINK might still exist in the medical field not 100% (idk why but i was looking up high res screens higher then 2500x160 and found 1 and it was medical)
bizzy400 1 year ago
@bizzy400 just a little math, everything is about money, making 24" WIDE LCD si much cheaper than same size 4:3 or 5:4
pixels are larger and there there are much less of them
But at all I prefer noWIDE monitors.
They are still making 5:4 and 4:3 LCD panels.
jezekus 1 year ago