Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson Debate at Westminster Theological Seminary, Part 3 of 12

A debate at Westminster Theological Seminary between Christopher Hitchens, renowned atheist, and Douglas Wilson, renowned Christian author. It was moderated by Dr. Scott Oliphint, and you can read his response to the debate at http://www.wts.edu/stayinformed/view.html?id=296.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Christopher Hitchens
• Douglas Wilson
• Hitchens-Wilson debate
• atheist
• apologetics
• Scott Oliphint

[chucka59]

@latelydown ,

Here you go if your to lazy to read your own Book.

Matt 5:22.-But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire.

Your Bible,not mine :P

[heeh2]

@nice1holmes

If you think so, you don't understand what faith means.

[jackiechano1]

that isle should be named after him now that he's gone.

[StevieWonder501]

@chucka59 "angry with his brother"

As a hint for the future, make sure you read the whole passage, looking into the context before making an assertion.

[StevieWonder501]

@chucka59 In the context, that's talking about calling a fellow brother in Christ a fool.

[ratedAD]

Every time Hitch opens his pen to jot down something, it makes me smile. You know he is writing down which weapon (from his infinite arsenal) to use to blow away each of the barricades his fleeing opponent tries to build.

[theBartone9119]

@latelydown Ahh shit you''re going to hell son! You called someone a fool!

[chucka59]

@latelydown,

Umm,ok? Where did I contradict myself? Nevermind,I wouldnt listen to you anyways,for you can't understand a simple point.

[latelydown]

@chucka59 sorry wrong choice of words... you're a FOOL!! you contradict yourself ... you are a skunk and people smells you from a distant ..sigh .. another waste of space

[kern0099]

@redcommander27 It's strange how this information posted on YouTube brings up an error msg again and and again., but here goes another try. Craig was propagating non-falsifiable conclusions from the work of Paul Cameron and George Reikers, among others Give them a google unless you want to keep your lunch down. An Accurate look into the minds of our "friends" the theists indeed.