Evolution is REAL Science #1

There are. Google Tiktaalik and Acanthostega.

I have already told you, this video gives evidence for macroevolution. You can't just declare no evidence exists while commenting on a video that provides it.
There is also the fact that we have observed macroevolution - watch?v=Dm277H3ot6Y

Progress in abiogenesis research is being made all the time -
sciencedaily . com/releases/2009/11/091120124 829 . htm

Circumstantial evidence indirectly proves a fact. In this case a theory. Just because the circumstances of the chromosomes are close does not mean they are exact. The video shows that we are not monkeys and we are different species. This doesn't disprove evolutions existence, but it also doesn't prove macro evolution exists. It just means there is no evidence in the video to prove we came from monkeys. If our ancestors are extinct, and the monkey was our very first. Why aren't monkeys extinct?

That last paragraph was one of the most scientifically illiterate and grammatically incoherent screeds I have ever come across.
If you want to educate yourself watch the videos on this channel, as well as those by AronRa, cdk007, DonExodus2, Concordance and various others, or alternatively read some books. I personally have no interest in continuing a discussion with a person who clearly has no understanding of the terms 'monkey', 'macroevolution', or even 'species'.

You can continue to believe there is enough evidence to prove we came from monkeys. You can also continue to believe we are monkeys. I will continue to understand the difference between species and that we are humans & not monkeys. Until there is enough concrete evidence that scientists can provide or witness any specie turning into another specie I could say evolution could be a process , but I still wouldn't believe creation is destroyed. Macro-evolution is still a theory and belief

Why is it that when ever somebody gets into a discussion that somebody seems to frequently attack the person and not the issue? I don't really care about grammar issues. Grammar errors can easily be fixed, but the evolution theory propaganda & tax supported money can't be restored to the tax payer. Is it a coincidence that most scientists support evolution because it is tax supported? Or is it because they make more money from charitable donations? Who else would support them?

Do you believe in science or scientists? If you have an idea, or a question, you have to be able to prove it and give evidence so that other scientists can check and test your results. Scientists still haven't proved Macro-evolution's existence. How much money needs to be spent to still prove it and teach it? Is it even worth it? There is no concrete evidence that can prove macro evolution to be absolute. The only evidence they have created was more theories. That's a rip off.