Tibetan Plateau: Meltdown Cancelled!!

Gou, X. et al. 2008. A dendrochronological analysis of maximum summer half-year temperature variations over the past 700 years on the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. DOI 10.1007/s00704-007-0336-y

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Climate
• change
• global
• warming
• ice
• Denial
• Tibet
• science
• refugee
• China
• dendrochronology
• temperature
• skeptic
• catastrophe

[TheMercilessEye]

So who do we trust...the local people, or some Kiwi git a half a world away from the scene?

watch?v=6Ut0dp6yU3M&feature=re­lated

[SteveWrathall]

@TheMercilessEye

What the hell has my geographical location got to do with it? I give a peer-reviewed reference to research which shows no warming. What is your response?

[TheMercilessEye]

Don't believe me about the Bush administration 'influencing' environmental data to allow for re-opening banned forest areas to logging? Look it up for yourself, moron...

[TheMercilessEye]

And what young punk wouldn't tell you the same thing to make a fast buck? LOLOL....

[TheMercilessEye]

Your one-sided analysis of my post is of no interest to me whatsoever, and does nothing to remove the validity of my statement. FAIL

[48hawai]

And it is highly in the interests of statists to promote climate catastrophism. Your dark murmurings about the tactics of opponents of climate catastrophism ring particularly hollow in the light of the fraud, exaggeration, and bullying of skeptics highlighted in the Climategate emails.

[48hawai]

Misguided policies to "solve" the "climate crisis" have devastated more forests than any other in the last 10 years, particularly the NZ Kyoto forest massacre, and the felling of tropical rainforest to plant palm oil-subsidised the mandates for a certain % of biofuels in petrol.

[48hawai]

Subjective human memory is nortoriously unreliable. What old codger won't tell you how different EVERYTHING was in the past?

[TheMercilessEye]

Particularly in light of the fact that it is HIGHLY in the interest of industrialists and capitalists to debunk global warming, so as to maintain the security of their current profit margins without having to worry about retooling to ensure there even IS a planet on which to spend their money. It is YOU who face the uphill battle, sir...not those who have included an acknowledgment of global warming into the realm of accepted scientific study.

[TheMercilessEye]

While you are, doubtless, considering a carefully crafted reply to this last post, I point out to you that, during the Bush Administration, PAID environmental 'scientists' SKEWED their work to favorably augment the Bush agenda for pillaging the American forests. The research of one or two or a handful of scientists 'debunking' global warming is to be equally called into question, since it is just as easy for them to be bought as it is for anyone else.

[TheMercilessEye]

My response is - you cite ONE PAPER.

I furnish you with the link to a video featuring testimonials by local people at the site of the area you 'debunk', people who are far more familiar with local conditions than you are ever likely to be. YOUR response?