Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Sharks are in trouble and need our help.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
815,107
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 12, 2009

A Save Our Seas Foundation Investigation.

Save Our Seas Foundation Chief Photographer Thomas P. Peschak talks about the issues surrounding his recent article published in Africa Geographic magazine on the shark nets off the Kwazulu-Natal coast.

Large numbers of sharks are a non-negotiable prerequisite for healthy seas. Sharks play an important stabilizing role in the ocean and South Africa is fortunate to harbor two of the worlds top shark hotspots. The western Capes icy seas, home to the great white shark and the subtropical waters off KwaZulu Natal (KZN) where tiger and zambezi sharks crown the top of the food chain. The western Cape and KZN differ not only in their respective shark faunas, but also in the type of relationships that people have chosen to have with sharks.

KZN is one of only a handful of places in the world where shark nets are still used. Many people wrongly believe that these nets are a continuous barrier that prevent sharks from approaching beaches. In reality they are gill nets designed to entangle, suffocate and kill sharks. In fact 40% of sharks are caught on the beach side of the nets on their way back out to sea. The rational is that reducing the number of sharks will also reduce the likelihood of shark bites. The first nets were installed in 1951 and were so effective that by 1989 45 kilomters were in place at 64 beaches, today managed by the parastal KZN Sharks Board.

Between 1978 and 2008 the nets caught 33684 large sharks and the present day haul is 600 sharks every year. Key targets are so-called dangerous sharks (great white, tiger and zambezi), but the majority caught are species that have never seriously injured a human. The nets also ensnare on average 230 rays, 58 turtles, 50 dolphins and 5 whales every year. We live in an time of great technological innovation, the era of space travel and nano-technology, surely we have the capability to develop non-lethal electric or chemical means to replace the archaic nets and allow sharks and ocean users to peacefull coexist?

Despite the environmental toll I believe that the greatest impact the nets have is on the human psychy. Their presence instills in generation after generation of beachgoers the belief that only a ocean free of sharks is safe to swim in. This of course is completely untrue and the true risk of shark bite is miniscule.

Fishing fleets kill 100 million sharks every year and many species have declined by 90 percent. Sharks are in trouble and need our help. Who though is going to have the desire and passion to conserve an animal that they falsely believe, in large part due to the presence of the shark nets, is going to eat them when they venture into the sea for a swim?

The unfortunate reality in KZN is that a large part of the public is still too fearfull to swim off beaches not protected by shark nets. I therefore belive it to be premature to lobby for the removal of all shark nets, especially those from popular bathing locations. However there are many nets at less utilized beaches that could be removed asap.

Sharks bites are not a uniquely KZN phenomenon and the Cape has had its share of incidences. There have been calls for shark nets in the wake of bites, but the public has repeatedly rejected them. The people of the Cape would rather have shark spotters than nets and in turn enjoy healthy oceans with sharks rather than decaying ones without.

A end to all shark killing in the name of bather protection in KZN will only come in the wake of a concerted effort to create a more shark tolerant society. I therefore wish to end with a call for action to all aspiring marine conservationists everywhere. Educate the people of KZN and the holiday visitors about sharks, bring the negative impacts of the nets to light and share how to safely co-exist with sharks. The more converts you find, the sooner KZN can stop killing sharks to protect bathers and join the rest of South Africa as a world leader in shark and marine conservation.

Thomas P. Peschak is an award winning photojournalist and marine biologist based in Cape Town, South Africa. He is the chief photographer for the Save our Seas Foundation and travels extensively to document shark conservation and research around the world.

To make your voice heard go to: www.removethenets.com

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 130 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,839)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i think by 2020 they will be all gone unless we stop shark finning and shark nets

  • we need sharks to life not to eat -.-'

  • hope the people killing these sharks r watchin this coz 1 day wen there all gone theyd wish they hadnt

  • Many of those smaller creatures eat parisites and algae, so then algae and things like that would be everywhere, and kill off everything else that lived in the ocean. So the thing is, we need healthy oceans.

  • You know, anyone that says they don't care about sharks and they can all die, is a total retard.

    If all sharks died, you would be dead, too. Here's an example: Sharks are at the top of the food chain. If they all died, the numbers of the fish and other creatures they eat would get out of control. Then the numbers of smaller things they eat would get too low. Then those bigger creatures would run out of food and die. I Will keep explaining this in another comment.

  • NICE DAY !!

    STIL LOTS OF PEOPLE

    BUT F.U.C.K.I.N.G. ON THIS PLANET WHERE ???

    NOT RUDE , JUST RIGHTOUS RIGHT !!

  • Meh, As much as I like animals, I have to say... survival of the fittest.

  • @KillerOfFire1057 Humans own the earth, everything else we allow to live.

  • somewhereatsea1: I don't know what your game is. You're probably not a troll since you rant your hate again and again. You defend finning of sharks with childish %numbers and with a "serves them right"-attitude. Your thinking of revenge at animals is what retarded people do. You most probably live too near some trees for seeing the forest. The dinosaur comparison? - Dude, please! As long as Man thinks animals och nature is Mans possessions for the taking, stupidity & malevolence will prevail.

  • Fuck sharks

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more