Grand Slam memories-Tennis

Bjor Borg was bigger then the game of tennis. He's an icon of cool and helped to define his times far beyond sports. Like Muhammad Ali or Pele. No one before and nobody after achieved this (not even Agassi).

Oh yeh..Never won a Aus Open, Never won a U.S Open. Quit in his 20's. Pretty pathetic actually. What marks a champion is ability to win on all surfaces and longevity! Both Borg lacked!

Agreed
BORG never wanted to take care of his outstanding account with BIG MAC ..
------------------------------ -------
ROGer lost his reign, like a champion. .And the continuous fighting...

I do no really agree with you. Bjorn never went to australia except once ( 1974) and if he won us open he should have gone to australia ( played as last tournamet at that time ) And according to us open , borg was in four finals ( was hurt in two of them and a death threatten in another but winning on french and wimbledon 78 -80 is almost impossible

the borg?are you one?....Sampras is one

federer
sampras
laver
borg
nadal

1.Laver - King
2.Federer -Prince
3.Sampras-Knight
4.Borg-Soldier
5.Rosewall-Soldier

top 5
1. Sampras
2. Nadal
3. Federer
4. Lendl
5. Edberg
Laver and borg are the best wooden raquet players ever

2- NADAL ????

1_Federer
2_Sampras
3_Laver
4_Borg
5_Agassi

consistency is not the only criteria, and even so he was in no way more consistent than Federer...someone can always make it to qfs and lose and be consistent, Lendl was great and, yes, consistent (6 straight US Open finals)but cmon Federer's WON 5 straight titles at 2 different majors (US & Wimbi) and 13 gs total in under 6 years as well as reaching 18 straight gs semis to this day...so yea Lendl was consistent, but not so much as Federer when taking into account Grand Slam performance