Pt 2 Proving Book of Abraham Facsimiles Refuting Larson

Refuting Charles Larso's contentions that Joseph Smith incorrectly restored the facsimiles in the Book of Abraham.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Charles
• Larson
• facsimiles
• Book
• Abraham
• Mormon

[Lboogie501]

wow! your a liar!

Everyone is stupid but you huh??

[TheBackyardProfessor]

@Lboogie501

GRIN! Lemmee guess...... your comprehension is not quite up to par as to what the vid is about? I wonder what clue you gave me to tell me that.......

[jwnaugle]

What book are you reading from?

[TheBackyardProfessor]

@jwnaugle

If I remember correctly, it was several different ones. I have some updated info on these items and subject I need to hustle and make more vids on. Thanks for your patience with it all. My plate is quite full now that winter has hit and I am plowing.....

[Lboogie501]

This proved absolutely nothing..... It's been proven that Joseph smith got nothing right lol. It's not rocket science.

[TheBackyardProfessor]

@Lboogie501

Joseph Smith has not been proven to have got it all wrong. You are correct about one thing though. It ISN'T rocket science, it's Egyptology.

[Lboogie501]

@TheBackyardProfessor

Dont be an idiot.... I know enough about this subject to see the obvious. I was born and raised in utah. Your making things up for the church to justify your religion. Get to the relationship with Christ and get past your biased views.

[MorrisonEnterprise]

all I hear is "bla bla bla apologetics and hoop jumping bla bla.." Smith was wrong about the Book of Abraham. Get over it.

[TheStrong32]

Um... the drawings in that book were not made by Egyptians. They are illustrations made for the book.

Pointing out variations between different hypocephalai has no bearing whatsoever on the fact that Joseph Smith's interpretation was totally unrelated to the object he was supposedly "translating."

[jerryleaves]

You sound like a guy with common sense, Backdoorprofessor. Why do you believe the Book of Abraham is authentic and should be considered as scripture?

[iopehema]

Prove to the world..otherwise without the wisdom from God..you are nothing the dust of the earth. What do you know about the dealings of God to the children of man. FOOL WITH YOUR FOOLISHNESS.

[IExposeMormonism]

I posted in a few variations, "American Antiquities and the Discoveries in the West", 1829-35. Josiah Priest. The 5th ed in 1835 says 25,000. I've owned many editions. It, like View of the Hebrews (and many others) asks was the Garden of Eden here, Noah, etc. It's a 1500AD question. The "anti-Mormon" Abe'Pap' documentaries says Champollion was unknown in 1835. Not So! Priest published over 35 pages of Champollion! So......

[IExposeMormonism]

I'm sure it's not the drawing variations in the BoftheD text. It's not the glyphs used. or those variations among texts. It's the Interpretation of the glyphs in the text. What do the jars represent. Should a birds head or mans head be on that missing portion. If JS has the only mans head version and his interpretation of the text in general, like the jars, is at variance with 20 yrs of established interpretation, the burden falls on JS/LDS to prove their case.

[KerryShirts]

That's your interpretation. I don't think it is accurate

[Lboogie501]

@TheBackyardProfessor

The bible gives a clear test of a prophet. Have it all right or your not from God.

[Lboogie501]

@TheBackyardProfessor

Good one professor backwards.

You Seriously can't let go of JS?

You honestly believe he was a tru prophet?

You think JS holds the keys to heaven?

God has a body of flesh and bone?

God had sex with mary?

There any many many Gods out there?

You can become a God one day?

etc... etc... etc...