TYT: Extended Clip September 30, 2011

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
8,888
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.
  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Anonops shutdown Bank of Amerka this afternoon:-)

  • The U.S. needs to make its politicians fear its people, then all this shit will stop and maybe things will get better...but i doubt it.

Video Responses

This video is a response to TYT - Extended Clip October 3, 2011
see all

All Comments (75)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • DO YOU FUCKING KNOW HOW LONG I HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS ABOUT THE CONTRACTORS!!!! HOLY FUCK! THEY WANT THE MONEY FOR CONTRACTORS PEOPLE! EVERYTHING ELSE IS ABOUT DISTRACTING YOU!

  • WHY DO THEY PUT UP THE WORDS IF THEY DON'T EVEN MATCH WHAT THEY ARE SAYING.

  • That football kid is NOT a typical FAT ass American kid, He,s Normal thats what makes him fast compared to the average(FAT ASS) kids

  • I never supported the war in Iraq but if I were Bush and I had this 'your with us or against us' stance and a stated policy of erradicating the Taliban, why half-ass it. I would have literally rooted them out no matter which nation they went to even if it were Russian territory and told them 'your with us or against us' but Russia stated they are with us with regard to terrorist and thus would have helped in that regard. Today the Taliban still exists and the US failed due to being derailed.

  • Since those in charge of our nation, especially neo-cons largely need to 'keep the threat alive' we desparately need another global threat after the cold war and one that is equally vague and shadowy so I think instead of systematically erradicating the taliban back in 2003-2005 by doing so in Pakistan we half assed it and instead made them our 'partners'. They are not partners. "you are with us or against us" remember and they clearly were not if it meant eradicating taliban in pakistan

  • We are in afganistan because our stated goal was to rid the nation of people who harbor and "help" terrorist. In this case the Taliban, though they were basically started in Pakistan and we should tell Pakistan we are moving into your nation to rid your nation, no use the term, Cleanse, your nation of the Taliban. That is what we are suppose to be doing there, and an eradication policy is the only answer. Less will not achieve effective success.

  • I HATE ADS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!@%@$#%@%

  • Everyone is prejudice towards someone or something. It's human nature

  • Dwight Eisenhower warned about what Cenk is saying about the military contracts.

  • Today they started drumming up Iran being a threat. It's coming, they want to go to war with Iran. WE NEED TO STOP OUR BLOOD THIRSTY, GREEDY ASS & EMPIRICAL GOVT!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more