Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

02 M3 vs 01 SC S2000

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,071
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 21, 2009

My friends dad thinks his M3 is god. I challenged him to a race. I beat him by a full car length off the line. He reduced my lead to a half a car length.

Good race Joe!

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (usdmeg)

  • and by the way....this s2000 is not much faster..even with a supercharger and 200 kg lighter...only a car length....

  • whatever asshat. Take your hate somewhere else. You cant even tell who won the race by this video.

    your R32 cant even hang with DC5 Integra type Rs! Even DC2 ITRs can walk all over the MK5 R32. Given Im a fan of the engine, its still pathetic

  • asshat?? wtf is that hahaha...teringmongooltje!! that was my old car...now i have a e46 m3 and offcourse the mkv r32 can't even hang with you're piece of shit with supercharger...try a standard s2000....or put supercharger on the r32 and you can't even hang with the r32 you understand what i m saying?? or are you retarded??

  • i didnt compare the r32 to my car, i compared it to older integrea type r's that are FWD. a standard s2000 will walk all over an r32 as well. of course an s2000 cannot hang with an e46 stock for stock, its in a different class and heavily under powered...

  • yes, 2nd gen GSX

  • I'm sorry man...just upset that an fi s2k is getting matched by an e46.

  • haha... dude why does everybody look down on m3s? They can run 13.0s with slicks!

Top Comments

  • slow compare to what.

    def. not fast but, i don't think they are slow either.

  • that was a intense race.

see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • of course people will hate on the M3, you can buy 2 s2000 for one M3 and the M3 does not have twice the Performance, it all comes down on what you can afford and what makes your dick hard

  • @usdmeg dont bother trying to explain to the shithead... the m3 has over 150 percent engine capacity, shame on it for not smashing the s2000.. and if the s2000 was a turbocharged one he would of lost, and by the way turbo kits for the s2000 are cheaper than most supercharges and make your car more powerfull... s2000 any day

  • @riceboi1983

    Probably. Because it's hard to ever come to the conclusion that an older m3 is faster than a supercharged s2k that has upped the boost to about 10 psi.

  • i give you props for racing your dad. i wish i can do that!

  • S2k has LSD

  • if it has more tq, it has better chance for stronger launch, 2 much tq will result wheel spin, yes. but m3 has traction control+LSD that s2k does not have. also its lot heavier so on straight line launch more weight is gonna be transfer to rear end which is gonna shove the tire in to pavement. also, i never directly said or made a connection on more tq=more traction on previous statement. r u retarded?

  • @suprattmtfkr ugh... why would a car have more grip if it has more tq? r u retarded?

  • that was dumb

  • no such thing as a stock S2000 sc

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more