Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

RATE (Radioisotopes And The Age of the Earth)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
3,671
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 20, 2007

New Findings Show Flaws In Old-Earth Dating Methods - http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/240426

By measuring amounts of different products of radioactive decay, scientists have discovered that a process called "accelerated nuclear decay" must have occurred—in other words, the rate that elements decay in rocks was sped up in the past, making it much faster than we see today. Tune in to part two of our series to learn how they came to this conclusion—and how this is powerful evidence for a young earth. New Rate Data Support a Young World - http://www.icr.org/article/114 .

What Comes after RATE? - http://www.icr.org/article/2468 .

The Amino Acid Racemization Dating Method - http://www.icr.org/article/69 .

Consequences of Time Dependent Nuclear Decay Indices on Half Lives - http://www.icr.org/article/200 .

Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution - http://www.warneveryone.com/evolution_scientists_quotes.htm

Live broadcasting with instant message - http://www.justin.tv/warneveryone

KJV1611 Bible - http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=authorizedversion&search=Search

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 36 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (846)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Non-Radiometric Dating Methods confirms with Radiometric Dating Methods.

  • Nuclear decay did not change just to match the bible story. There is no geologic evidence for a global flood.

  • Is there a version of this on youtube that is video and not just audio?

  • @keith1y The Coconino Sandstone, the third layer down in the Grand Canyon, is from wind blown desert sands. We know this from the cross-bedding, the type of sand and the fossils in it.

    NOT A SEDIMENTARY ROCK IS FROM WATER. There was no global flood. It can't explain the ash layers, fossils sorting, coral reefs, limestone, chalk or anything else we find in geology.

  • @gregrutz "They found distinct layers of different kinds of rock with different fossil in them. Floods don't do that." - That is exactly what floods do do. I googled "floods sort fossils", I have also seen water tanks experiments online demonstrating it. There are other factors, like for example the mud flows that produced the nautiloids layer in the grand canyon. See video - "Origins - Mud Flow Madness with Dr. Steve Austin"

  • @keith1y Bible packing Geologists went looking for evidence of a global flood over 200 years ago. They did not find any. They found distinct layers of different kinds of rock with different fossil in them. Floods don't do that. They discovered it must have taken millions of years to make what we see. Go to the Grand Canyon and read about the Super Group of rock layers.

  • @gregrutz define "knew".

  • @keith1y So what? Geologists knew the earth was millions of years old before radiometric dating was invented. Geologists also know there was never a global flood. Talk to them.

  • @gregrutz "nuclear decay never changes" huh, all you have to do is google for "The strange case of solar flares and radioactive elements", enjoy.

  • @kermitdfrogz That's nice but does not explain the Egyptian and Chinese who were here 7000 years ago.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more