(2/5)TANKS!: Blitzkrieg; A Blueprint for Victory
Uploader Comments (2bn442RCT)
Top Comments
-
The documentary makes an important point that many people overlook - the campaign in Poland is much more a case of Kesselschlacht (encirclement or envelopment) than of Blitzkrieg, although it did have elements of the latter. The invasion of France in 1940 was much more a case of classic Blitzkrieg.
Video Responses
All Comments (13)
-
@Wushuki This is true what you say. They used the horse as a transport element. The Polish Army did use horse cav against an assembly area in a fast strike manner. This was more a guerrilla attack in force.
-
@Wushuki well wikipedia is not always right. remember it is written by men and men make mistakes, like the war for example...
-
I forget to precise that It's true that the polish cavalry charge against tanks is a myth.
-
The cavalry charge against infantry was still very effective like German soldiers later told as they remembered their Polish campaign, many of them where shocked and only the tanks could save the day. furthermore it wasn't worse to be on a horse unit against tanks than on a foot one.... the horses are faster and can operate in terrains where tanks are totally unadequate.
-
this is true you even see it from minutes 08.02 to 08.10 the horses carriages are training infantry cannons for dismounted firefight. even Germans still had a lot of artillery and troops still using horses but only to travel and carry loads. like mountain infantry even in late eighties in Switzerland
-
Encirclement is later phase of Blitzkrieg, instead of trying to flank the enemy from his sides or his back, Blitzkieg hits the enemy right to his front of defense, split it in half, making the way for motorized infantry advance, then encircle the halves and finish them off.
-
As far as I know the myth was made up by German propaganda.
Somehow historiography had a tendency to believe the German Wochenschau with this kind of information.
For example you can still read about the horrible mutilations perpetrated by the Red Army in the massacre at Nemmersdorf in many legitimate books. As it turned out the only source for these mutilations is the Wochenschau. Recent research revealed the bodies were in fact maimed by the Germans before filming. It's downright embarrasing.
-
I would argue that Blitzkrieg (a phrase coined by the British media) is in fact encirclement warfare. Motorised infantry and armoured troops with air support advanced along the flanks of the enemy force. Thereby the enemy found himself encircled when the main body of the army arrived. This tactic was also employed by the Soviet army during through Eastern and Central Europe.
The French army collapsed after absolutely misjudging German plans of advance.
-
Polish Cavalry did not charge German tanks with horse-mounted cavalry. It only charged resting tank crews. The myth originated from war correspondents reports of the Battle of Krojanty, where a Polish cavalry brigade was fired upon in ambush by hidden armored vehicles, after it had mounted a sabre-charge against German infantry. Weapons that were used against tanks were anti-tank rifles "UR" and light artillery such as the highly effective Bofors 37 mm antitank gun.
-
Polish Air Force was not destroyed on the ground. It had been moved from air bases to small camouflaged airfields shortly before the war. It remained active up to the second week of the campaign. The Luftwaffe lost 285 aircraft, with 279 more damaged, while Polish air force lost 333 aircraft.
According to wikipedia it is a myth that polish cavalry charged the panzer tanks with swords and lances. Instead they were used as pseudo-motorized cavalry to quickly move infantry over long distances. In battle they used anti tank rifles and other guns.
Wikipedia also claims that it is a myth that the polish air force was destroyed on the ground.
Wushuki 2 years ago
Many books claim this was a myth.
2bn442RCT 2 years ago