Life - the royal flush of nature

Even though the odds of life being the way it is are astronomically small, to say it's just about impossible for life to have arisen by mere chance, the odds of it being any way different, are exactly the same. Life as we know it, came here through accidents, random events, random chance, flukes, etcetera. No design AT ALL, no gods, no nothing. Just randomness in nature.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• life
• nature
• random
• impossible
• creation
• Evolution

[jjstevens03]

The problem of asserting that the origin of life or the origin of the universe are random, chance events is that science can't proove that something is lacking order or design, negative statements can't be proven, therefore scientific naturalism oversteps the bounds of science by claiming there is nothing outside of the natural realm. And yes the chances of drawing any 5 cars is the same, but if we were playing poker and I kept getting royal flushes, youd say I was cheating

[PJDesseyn]

@jjstevens03:

1) energy cannot be created nor destroyed and is thus eternal

2) Quantum Darwinism

3) we already conclusively know that all gods are imaginary, as we know we imagined them.

Stop believing in fairy tales, start accepting reality.

[PissGargle]

My pregnant sister was a passenger in a car, when all of a sudden, the car was struck from the rear by another vehicle. The impact caused her to go into labour, and she ended up delivering a baby right there on the spot. This proves the point of your video!! Life is truly an accident!!

[PJDesseyn]

@soctratesforthewin: because of all the spamming you just did, constantly using insulting me and presenting bullshit, you're now blocked.

You think you're smart, but reality's a bitch and sure disagrees with you. I've lost my patience with retards like you. You play all high and mighty, but when push comes to shove, you have nothing to support yourself.

Cheery-o, disgrace to mankind.

[soctratesforthewin]

@PJDesseyn

Amazing how kids like you accuse people of 'spamming' just for disagreeing!!

[soctratesforthewin]

@PJDesseyn

Since you cannot make up your mind whether you're arguing with or against science you can easily be dismissed as irrational. Go study probability theory before making a complete and utter fool of yourself. Nob.

[soctratesforthewin]

@PJDesseyn

Roger Penrose is one of the most respected physicists working in England today. To make that ad hominem attack is absurd from you and it is ad hominem. You wouldn't even be able to make that calculation he did because you are no mathematician and you are no physicist. In fact you're no kind of intellectual at all.

[PJDesseyn]

@soctratesforthewin: I didn't say anyone isn't allowed to give their views. I'm just saying the guy pulled that number out of his ass. Also, I didn't talk about quantum mechanics. I just threw in the term. Now, unless you have any facts or evidence for your claims and beliefs, kindly fuck off and stop spamming my channel and vids.

[soctratesforthewin]

@PJDesseyn

I love the irony. Apparently the best scientists in the world are not allowed to give their views on physics but YOU are allowed to talk about quantum mechanics!!

[PJDesseyn]

@soctratesforthewin: actually, you CAN start with a presupposition. That's why they call it a pre-supposition...you SUPPOSE it's true, before (PRE) you confirmed it...

What we know: there's one universe WE CAN PERCEIVE. We also see that all of nature uses Darwinian Evolution, meaning that a large number of events occur, but only those that work get passed on. Then loads of quantum physics and so on and you get to infinite universes, in which we live in one that works.

no fallacies made by me.