Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Peter Singer: Animal Rights

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
750 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 15, 2011

http://socraticmama.com/ [Inspiration & Support for Secular Families]
OVERVIEW:
July 2007 "William Crawley meets..." Series in which William Crawley, BBC journalist and broadcaster, meets the people shaping the world we live in today

THIS EPISODE:
Are human beings superior to animals? Not according to the Peter Singer, one of the world's most influential philosophers who says it's time humans faced up to the suffering they have inflicted on animals.

SINGER:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Singer
http://www.princeton.edu/~psinger/
Peter Albert David Singer (born 6 July 1946) is an Australian philosopher who is the Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University and Laureate Professor at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics at the University of Melbourne. He specialises in applied ethics and approaches ethical issues from a secular, preference utilitarian perspective.

He has served, on two occasions, as chair of philosophy at Monash University, where he founded its Centre for Human Bioethics. In 1996, he unsuccessfully stood as a Greens candidate for the Australian Senate. In 2004, he was recognised as the Australian Humanist of the Year by the Council of Australian Humanist Societies. He has been voted one of Australia's ten most influential public intellectuals. Singer serves on the Advisory Board of Incentives for Global Health, the NGO formed to develop the Health Impact Fund proposal.

Outside academic circles, Singer is best known for his book Animal Liberation, widely regarded as the touchstone of the animal liberation movement. Not all members of the animal liberation movement share this view, and Singer himself has said the media overstates his status. His views on that and other issues in bioethics have attracted attention and a degree of controversy.

CRAWLEY:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Crawley
http://www.specialistspeakers.com/?p=2407

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • The problem is that people take what he say and think, "ok, we need to treat humans and children worse, to make things rational and coherent with the way we treat animals."

    Obviously what he means is, if we can't treat animals better, then there is no reason to treat humans better, as it's hypocritical and incoherent. But his preferred solution is to improve the way we treat other animals and by that also treat humans better in every way.

see all

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Unfortunately, Peter signer was probably wrong again on the brainless babies. Person-hood of humans is not only about the brains. Brains was not developed in the embryos until a rather late stage. Hearts influence personality too. From a holistic perspective, all body parts matters. As a general rule, those important/fundamental body parts developed earlier in the embryo. There was a news story on Youtube, a baby who was born without a brain can actually tell he was holed by his mom and grandma.

  • This was a very fascinating and educational interview, now excuse me as i fuck my dog. just joking but it was thought provoking.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more