How Evolution Works Part 5- Natural Selection
Loading...
Loading...
25,979
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 0:37Natural Selection Videoby RingTales13,748 views
Featured Video
- 1:30DonExodus, Thunderfoot, VFX - Magic Sandwich Sh...by DonExodus216,367 views
- 5:36Creationism on Huffington Post. My interview p...by DonExodus211,769 views
- 14:10Creationism on Huffington Post. My interview p...by DonExodus26,358 views
- 14:55Creationism on Huffington Post. My interview p...by DonExodus26,651 views
- 3:20Famous atheists last words before dying.by 1dragonleader13,551 views
- 9:13Venomfangx Responseby DonExodus239,132 views
- 1:58The Theory of Evolution in 2 Minutes.by DonExodus2129,091 views
- 11:00How Evolution Works 7: Speciationby DonExodus234,822 views
- 8:45How Evolution Works- Forces (Part 2)by DonExodus247,988 views
- 7:003 Simple Questions for Evolutionistsby IslamoPhilic30,549 views
- 9:53Evolution vs Creation : # 9 Natural Selectionby zonkas20,329 views
- 10:00The Origin of Life - Abiogenesis - Dr. Jack Szo...by cdk007496,689 views
- 9:301. Evolution vs. Creationism: Listen to the Sci...by hoffmanallison873,613 views
- 5:57Evidence for Evolution, Part IIby cdk00780,027 views
- 9:54A Scientist's Critique of Ben Stein's Expelledby DonExodus2116,411 views
- 9:53How Evolution REALLY Works, Part IIby cdk00733,665 views
- 9:517 -- The Theory of Evolution Made Easyby potholer54358,215 views
- 9:10Proof of Evolution - Part 4 Embryologyby DonExodus241,911 views
- 8:37150 years of Natural Selectionby EvolutionToday1,630 views
Let me ask a question. I just started watching this series, and a question came to mind. Since humans create what is needed to survive (I think we can all agree on that), does that mean human evolution is at an end? Humans are not like a wild animal that has to constantly fight for survival. We create what we need, so do humans keep evolving? I'm talking about modern day humans, not hose living 40,000 year ago
truthforchrist 4 days ago
@NathanWubs A fruitfly DNA has been manipulated millions of times in labs all over the world to mimic millions of years of evolution yet a fruitfly remained a fruitfly. There never was an evolution. Fossils some dated 250 million years ago showed no sign of evolution at all.
daogdaog 1 month ago
@daogdaog wrong and wrong.
Piltdownman was considerd a hoax for a long time by scientist. Scientist looked at it several times before indeed being able to discard it completly, but that is called being thorough.
You are completely wrong about the second part. But then again you got the information from a creationist website. Maybe even from Kent Hovinds website.
NathanWubs 1 month ago
@kotoroshinoto When it holds up across every organism on the planet? Like a worm which has 75 percent identical to human DNA? Can you say that a worm is just a small portion into becoming a human?
daogdaog 1 month ago
@daogdaog by itself in a one to one species comparison if that was the ONLY time it showed relatedness, then I would agree. When it holds up across every organism on the planet its a bit stronger than that.
kotoroshinoto 1 month ago
@kotoroshinoto Who is having a bias here? comparison in DNA does not mean one specie evolve from another specie or related to entirely new specie. It simply meant one specie is different from the other specie, That is the most constructive and honest conclusion we can get from such comparison.
daogdaog 1 month ago
@daogdaog why don't you just admit your confirmation bias, and that you will not be swayed by any amount of evidence or logic? The discussion is not constructive because you're not approaching it with an honest intent.
kotoroshinoto 2 months ago
@kotoroshinoto It is all speculative computations. That is precisely why biologists have so many divergence dates for human-chimp or human-neanderthals. If they get dates too far back then they make another speculation. That is evolution, just speculations after speculations.
daogdaog 2 months ago