Episode #006 (Genesis, One Confusing Book?) - Archived
Uploader Comments (TCGarchive)
All Comments (26)
-
Boring
-
If you have Creation/Evolution questions for Eric, you can submit them through the contact page on our website, creationguys (dot) com.
Jonathan Sampson of
The Creation Guys
-
I meant the one you're sitting next to in the vid.
-
Which Hovind? The one you sit next to, that one.
Kent, I woulnd't expect a response from in about... a couple years. If any that is.
-
Depends, which Hovind? Eric is readily available, but Dr. Hovind obviously isn't.
Jonathan Sampson
-
Hey John, any way I can ask Hovind a couple a questions?
-
Everything is, of course, open in science regarding physical universe, and we must accept the evidence as it is, whether or not we like it.
Like Earth being about 4,5 billion years old and that we evolved.
-
Thanks Saukko31,
That's a bit more open minded than everybody else who addresses the subject and reject Creation Science, and Intelligent Design a priori based upon preconceived ideas that may or may not be true.
Jonathan Sampson of
The Creation Guys
-
"My bad then. But its kind of hard to tell who the response was to, since the youtube comments offer only one level of indentation to the text. ;)"
I know, man. It's annoying me too.
Jonathan Sampson of
The Creation Guys
-
Genesis records light being created prior to the Sun. The light source, potentially God himself, correlating with Revelation where God is the ultimate source of light in the end. If you want deeper scientific ideas, consult Humphreys' Starlight and Time, Appendix B.
Distant starlight is another great subject to discuss, but seeing how we have 500 chars, let's finish one conversation first.
Jonathan Sampson of
The Creation Guys
NOOOO!!! Three biologists who do not accept evolution, the theory is doomed, DOOOOOOMED!!!
sypher113 3 years ago
I guess they never heard of Project Steve.
But they will probably call it the work of the devil and dismiss it, so...
TCGarchive 3 years ago
actually, they just say it wasn't intended to show a majority believe in it, but that if some rogue scientists in unrelated fields believe it, then it should be taught in classrooms. STUPID.
nomercyrules10 3 years ago
Yeah, by their logic, flat earthism should be taught in schools because there still are people who dont accept the "theory" that the earth is round, LOL.
The members of the Flat Earth Society are proof that there is a controversy around the issue of whether or not the earth is round! They therefore deserve equal time in classrooms to teach their theory too! :D
TCGarchive 3 years ago