I will become Protestant if...

Why are the Original Apostolic Churches wrong on this? Prove me wrong on my beliefs.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• eucharist
• real
• presence
• catholic
• orthodox
• protestant
• bread
• wine
• body
• blood
• apostolic
• christ
• church
• god
• lamb

[medusa210562]

@nepistepa God bless.

[medusa210562]

@nepistepa John 6:35 I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never go hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty. This proves that transubstantiation is not biblical.

[medusa210562]

@nepistepa John 6:32-33 "Jesus said to them, “Very truly I tell you, it is not Moses who has given you the bread from heaven, but it is my Father who gives you the true bread from heaven. 33 For the bread of God is the bread that comes down from heaven and gives life to the world." This proves that transubstantiation in not biblical.

[medusa210562]

@medusa210562 have you looked at the response video on this page.

[medusa210562]

@nepistepa When I eat the bread I eat the real body of Christ (spiritually) but I eat just bread (phisically)

[nepistepa]

@medusa210562 God forgive you, you should be burning with shame before Him for your bigotry and self-deception, where you select the history that suits you and ignore the history that doesn't. God is truth and when you deny truth, whether Biblical or historical, you deny Him and he sees your heart even more clearly than I do. I'm signing off.

[nepistepa]

@medusa210562 What hypocrisy you write! "If I have to use history to prove my point I will go against my believes." Indeed? So why do you bring up the history of Catholic treatment of heretics? That's history. Isn't that 'using history to prove your point'? Get real with yourself. You're living in denial. Your church did not exist before the Reformation. Your sola scriptura & Eucharistic doctrines did not exist before the Reformation. They are innovations, a departure from Christ.

[nepistepa]

@medusa210562 @medusa210562 You say, "transubstantiation is not in the bible". Your teaching isn't articulated in the Bible either, come off it. If you think you can pull one over on me, think again. I'm not the one living in denial here. Both teachings are extrapolations from the same evidence. And don't punt videos at me. If you can't make this kind of argument yourself, that tells you something.

[nepistepa]

@medusa210562 Why on earth are you quoting John 6:35? You think I don't believe Jesus is the bread of life? Why on EARTH are you quoting Heb 13:8 which condemns you for believing doctrines (opposed to Church doctrine) only introduced in the 16th century? Why on earth are you quoting Hebrews 7:27 & 10:1? Of course Christ doesn't offer up sacrifice daily. That's about Jewish sacrifice of animals, not Paul's teaching. As for John 6:63, do you think Christ's flesh 'profiteth' nothing?

[medusa210562]

@nepistepa Any one can be a false prophet, Luther of any pope etc etc. That is why we need the bible. that is why we need the bible. Not apostolic succession. Apostolic succession made of some popes who even had their lovechild became the next pope.

[medusa210562]

@nepistepa look at the vidoe Think -is transubstatiation really true? By csmatyi

[medusa210562]

@nepistepa When I eat the bread I eat the real body of Christ (spiritually) but I eat just bread (phisically). TRANSUBSTANTIATION IS OF THE DEVIL.

[medusa210562]

@nepistepa I am the bread of life; he who comes to Me will not hunger, and he who believes in Me will never thirst John 6:35