Scientists simulate jet colliding with World Trade Center

*cry*

Bilderberg?????HA FUCKING HA when you have no idea what your talking about throw in bilderberg or the illuminati cos then know one else will,apart from folk who actually know what went down,air traffic controllers who followed the planes from take off to impact,THEY KNOW WHAT HAPPENED,TRUTHER KNOWS FUCKING SHIT,go and roll another one up you cabbage.

conspiracy theorists are like christian bible basher creationists,they just KNOW theyre right,what a bunch of small minded fuckwits,ive 'opened' my mind to the 'truth' and its this ,planes were hijacked by islamic fundamentalists who used box cutters to get control of the planes which then were flown into the wtc,which then collapsed,have some decency and remember your sad masturbatory rants and delusions are a stain on the memory of those whio died that day, i pity your lack of moral parameter.

Merlin5x5, seriously. Don't you have anything better than ridicule truth-seekers all day? It's like.. pretty much the most evil thing you can do with your spare time. Or are you at work?

9/11 wasn't Al-Qaeda or the "US govt" it was the NWO, bilderberg, UN, IMF, WHO, FEMA, DHS, CFR, FBI, CIA

Check NufffRespect's "9/11 Coincidences" watch?v=Odp1FO0Vmuw

No, actually, it would have collapsed too, even if NOT hit by a plane.

Granite, despite your fantasies, cannot be built into a block as high as the WTC, it's own internal stresses would have caused it to collapse as they did at the Bent Pyramid in Egypt.

The NASTRAN FEA model would have picked this up, as it has to calculate the environment before simulating any impact in the environment.

Do you understand this now, rabbit?

NASTRAN simulates the environment VERY accurately.

Pardonéz mois, ohh you all knowing merlin, I am unworthy!

Actually I don't give a shit, you can simulate your ass off all night long with your mighty simulation. It's not the fact that it can't simulate the environment (which I am sure it can do very accurately). If the simulation is very accurate, so you can model the building to be made of (among others) a weaker material than it actually was made of. So the question still is: did you model the building to be weaker than it actually was?

No, actually, you can't.
You still don't get it do you.?

NASTRAN actually calculates every square inch of material. First by gravity, then by EVERY factor that affects a material on earth, THEN by the event that is happening to it, in exquisite detail.

SO, you can't model the building to made out of anything that could not hold it's position in REAL LIFE.

SO, you can't model a Cardboard skyscraper, it would not hold up, and NASTRAN would stop the simulation, WAAAY before animation.

Whatever dude

search "scalar 9 11"