Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Lolita

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
145,190
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 20, 2006

The original trailer of the film. Stanley Kubrick 1962.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 13 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Just keep in mind how the movie ends. This relationship was disastrous for both Humbert and Lolita.

  • Peter Sellers is fantasic in this

see all

All Comments (63)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • weird trailer. if i hadn't looked up the plot on wiki beforehand i still wouldn't know what the hell this movie's about. lol.

  • And I am confident that you are not tired, you are just scared that whatever refutations you have will be critically examined and refuted by yours truly.

    So bring it on.

  • @thegalwegian I'm waaay too tired to make you look like an idiot right now.

    However, I'm confident that you did a pretty good job of that yourself.

  • contin:The masses and morons

    you are refering to include parents, many of who like to hear both sides of the debate but are also the ones who know their children better than any other

    adult around. Shy was abused between age 3-14 by Stanley and he also sold her to other pedophiles. The only reason I see to why this vid came up when I searched "Stanley Claridge"

    is that name has been used as a tag for it. Is there another Stanley Clarenbridge involved in production of the movie or book?

  • continuing: penetrative sex

    discouraged by making sure they understand the harmful effects it can have, with condom ( regarding anal )

    and without condom, is reasonable.

    So newsnight bbc who did the investigation into the abuse of Shy Keenan is junkmedia, but channel 4 who did the series which cover work by M.Sawyer isn´t?

    Thanks to newsnight, Claridge, who was still abusing children in the neighbourhood was brought to justice.

    How is this not protection?

  • Yes in fairness, lolita was not prepubescent, so not

    pedophilia. However a child being pubescent doesn´t

    mean ready for sex, emotionally or biologically. And

    the sources you cite doesn´t support what your 29-year

    old sexual partner did as far as I can tell. I agree

    with them as far as the negative impacts of to little

    sex-education and smutty culture on childrens development.

    That children between 14-18 should be restricted to having

    sex with members of their peergroup,

  • thegal: To distinguish aBused from aMused ( which I was as a NON-victim at 13 with a 29 year old) this complex issue can't be defined by junk-media extreme cases for profit not protection. Checkout serious academics like Miranda Sawyer ' ' Sex Before 16, Why the Law is Failing ' ' and  Judith Levine ' ' Harmful To Minors, The Perils Of Protecting Children From Sex ' '. As always, there are far more kids aMused than aBused which control-freaks don't want the masses and morons to know about.

  • I searched "Stanley Claridge": the merseyside pedophile who abused countless children and who was finally convicted thanks to former victim Shy Keenan who bravely went to his house wearing a hidden camera and made him talk of his crimes; AND THIS VID CAME UP ON RESULTS!!! Get it through your head people, movies like these enables pedophiles, search Shy Keenan and watch documentary.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more