Steven Jones Q & A

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,812
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 23, 2006

Professor Steven Jones fends off spacebeamers at UC Berkeley November 11, 2006

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • he makes no sense... the only research worthy of the term so far has been the Judy Wood research

  • almost a year? try 6 years m8!

  • Jones is an a-hole.

  • So if the steel was carted away immediately, and the concrete of the building was reduced to dust, what was being cleaned up for almost a year at Ground Zero?

  • Wood and Reynolds are moles? How ingenious! And those "moles" are regulary prosecuting the perpetrators, right?

    Come to think of it, Wood and Reynolds are the ONLY ones prosecuting the perpetrators. Hummm... imagine that. You are right, there is a cover-up.

    "And ye shall judge them by their fruits."

  • Wood has never said anything about space beams! Jones is dishonestly promoting "space beams" and "ray beams from space." Google those terms and see what sites they take you to! Next question: why do these folks promote disinformation?

  • OK it is a accurate observation about 85% of the time. Your video evidence actually is more evidence that the truth movement is right about CD being the cause of the 3 wtc building collapses. Your observation of the collapse time is wrong.

  • lisabob22 said

    "it is a room on top of the building"

    OK I can see I won't be able to make you see that a "a room on top of the building" is actually part of the building(actually it's the top of the building) so I won't waste any time debating it.

    I would suggest you read what a team of independent experts had to say about the collapses of WTC 1,2 & 3

    IMPLOSIONWORLD'S PAPER ON THE WORLD TRADE CENTER COLLAPSE'S

    implosionworld. com/news. htm#1

    It's the top link on the page.

  • lisabob22

    "no it is a accurate observation"

    Have I insulted you in any way?

    I have provided video and scientific evidence to you that you can choose to either consider and enlighten yourself or keep your self in the dark.

  • As I said it is a room on top of the building. The collapse of the building starts when it starts to fall, which is easily seen in all videos. The collapse of the mech. room on top of WTC7 is evidence that explosives were used on the core columns. As in all CD's the explosions cause the collapse, but it takes a little time. You start timing the collapse of the building when it starts to fall, not when a room on top is destroyed.

    do you understand how your logic is wrong?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more