Intelligent Design For Dummies - Part 1 - Intro

Intelligent Design Uncensored!
Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bs4ssFXTZ54

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Intelligent
• Design
• science
• evolution
• atheism
• urbanelf
• onceforgivennowfree

[bigboy45454545]

You're an idiot.

[onceforgivennowfree]

@bigboy45454545

Hey,

I don't mind if people think I'm an idiot. What would be helpful tho is if you could actually engage the points I make and tell me where you disagree, and why. When you leave a comment like this, you are the one that makes Atheists look like idiots, since they do not provide any evidence or facts whatsoever to support their position.  In other words, please try again, and use REASON and LOGIC. If that is too much to ask...fine....move on....

[419Films]

@Howie47 This video claims that people who argue against ID don't understand ID. This comment is a perfect example of the opposite - someone arguing against evolution with 0 understanding of it.

[borissman]

conclusion: you're an idiot

[1tabligh]

@bismarket Some people try to propagate this *fantasy* in the garb of science and to present their choice as having been dictated by scientific thought. In the final analysis, however, the denial involved in such an assertion is unworthy of science and philosophy, and even *contradicts* empirical logic.

[1tabligh]

@bismarket Even if the followers of a religious school of thought had no proofs for their claim, to conclude firmly and forcibly that non- being reigns beyond the sensory realm would be a non-scientific choice, based on imagination and speculation.

[bismarket]

@1tabligh I've now had enough of this, your just throwing quotes you've found on the Internet at me as you obviously have no unique ideas of your own or at least cannot be bothered to put them into your own words, as i suspect your not even aware of their meaning. (Pseudo-Scientific Demagoguery) Does this look familiar? I am able to use Googl too. Goodbye, You FAIL!

[1tabligh]

@bismarket Views such as these derive directly from a system of thought centered on materialism; within it, everything is defined and delimited with reference to materialism.

To interpret materialism in such a sense is in the final analysis strictly meaningless; it would be a superstitious notion involving the perversion of truth, and to regard it as scientific would, in fact, be *treason* to science.

[bismarket]

@1tabligh Direct quote from Muḥammad Bāqir Ṣadr yes?

[bismarket]

@1tabligh Comte, Put forward this idea stating that it irrelevant regarding initial causes or origins - Such as god as creator of the universe? To be honest i'm not sure if i even understand Positivism fully. However i could be right anyway because as MOST people understand the phrase, it holds true in the sense that i used it.

[bismarket]

@1tabligh See Previous answer!

[bismarket]

@1tabligh Your not making sense, it would mean that i would have to supply you with PROOF that fairies, goblins, elves, etc' are not real & unless i could, then by default they must exist! Surely you can see where this fails?