Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Approval Ratings: The Public v. McCain

Get this ad on TV! - http://truthandhope.org/ Although I enjoyed Barack Obama's recent web ad "Embrace" (the one with lots of hugging between Bush and McCain), I still think the campaign needs to ...  
 
Customize

More From: CartwrightDale

Loading...
Play All Stop Autoplaying | Play Next

QuickList(0)

Clear | Save

Related Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
4,423 ratings
Sign in to rate
346,493 views
Flag
close
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...
Sign in to post a Video Response

Video Responses (4)

View All - Play All
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (2,086)   Options

Loading...
YinSasuxHinaYang (4 months ago) Show Hide
 -4
Marked as spam
Reply
Bush wasn't THAT BAD!!
These people who thought voting for Obama was for the best because it was "time for change" are DEAD WRONG. Another Bush would have been a whole lot better than Obama. Over the time period of 50 days, Obama has the worst approval ratings EVER. EVER. Not kidding.
My Great-Gram loved Richard Nixon and I'll model myself after her. When someone said something bad about Nixon she told them to get out of the f$@#ing house. I'll do the same with Bush.
fornss (4 months ago) Show Hide
+4
Marked as spam
"Obama has the worst approval ratings EVER. EVER. Not kidding...My Great-Gram loved Richard Nixon and I'll model myself after her."

Worst comment ever. My grandma said the earth was flat so of course, the earth is indeed flat. And worst approval ratings ever? Maybe in your crazed head.
DarkNowInDachau (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
This is just a flat out lie. Bush left office with a 22-23% approval rating. Obama's at mid-30's. Bush is the only president I've ever seen to screw up a perfectly good economy at the beginning of their term, then have all of his voters blame the new guy. Btw, the consumer spending numbers for last quarter are higher than Bush's were for the past 3 years.
gypsykingg (5 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
i support bush more than ever. every president does something wrong. their not perfect. he did many great think. and in the years to come people will start to realize that more and more
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
Rybobert (6 months ago) Show Hide
 -3
Marked as spam
freaked out right now so sorry In 2003 there was a boy named Link, and his friends at school were bullying him and laughing at him because his name was the same as a game character. Half a year later he was found in the kitchen with a knife. He had slit his throat. If you don't put this on 3 videos in 10 minutes, he will stab you with the knife in your neck while you're asleep. again sorry some weirdo posted this
rw11111 (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Do you yourself a favor and stop argueing with him. He will try to break your points with frivilous things and will refuse to quit argueing. Trust me its pointless, just let it go.
AcomsRazor1776 (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Look up the Both the Chemical and Bio weapons conventions. The UN forced Saddam to join both after the first gulf war and constant supervision was required as part of the terms set after the 1st gulf war. You didn't study hard enough. And in a way it was the reason for the war against saddam. HE was warned Multiple times and each time he refused.
DarkNowInDachau (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
No, Iraq joined the CWC in February of this year. Intel showed that most of the WMD and chemical infrastructure in Iraq was destroyed in Operation Desert Fox in December of '98. Saddam, along with Egypt, refused to sign the CWC until something was down about Israel's weapons program since this aspect left Muslim countries defenseless against Israel and allies if they chose to strike. The UN tried to force Iraq to join in '97, but to no avail - making this an illegal sanction by int'l law.
DarkNowInDachau (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So, that leads to March 19, 2003 - a war declared without official treaties and based on the existence of a weapons arsenal that was declared as destroyed 4 years and 3 months earlier. Once again, I know almost everything there is to know about the Middle Eastern theatre. The reason for war against Saddam was weapons of mass destruction. Not "multiple warnings and refusals."

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.